My three-year-old daughter Scout does not like bugs. Who does?
Still, I excoriated her yesterday when, walking down the sidewalk, she purposely stepped on a bug.
"You do not kill bugs for no reason!" I bellowed, and when she offered to apologize to the bug, I said, "No, it's too late. The bug is dead!"
I felt at once that I'd been too harsh--and, with my "for no reason" clause (built in to avoid charges of hypocrisy related to my own murder of a moth that was driving me batty in the bathroom last week), too light.
Nobody seems to know how to explain to employees why the CEO makes $15 kagillion. But does anybody know how to explain to a three-year-old that the kings of the animal kingdom should be discerning in the squashing of bugs?
Comments (16)
You could explain to her that bugs have a role in the universe, and give the example of the honeybee.
BTW, I do LOVE bugs. I've even written about the American cockroach.
http://www.slywy.com/writings/american.html
And had Madagascan hissing cockroaches crawling on my arm. They have little Beatrix Potter faces. Honest.
Posted by Diane | June 14, 2007 12:23 PM
Posted on June 14, 2007 12:23
Well, that's a good idea. Except I want her to resist snuffing out a life for the very reason that snuffing out a life is a big-ass decision to make, whether or not we think that life has a "role" or not. And is the moth's "role" in the universe superceded by my annoyance at the moth?
I realize I'm looking for a perfect answer where there is none. Perhaps the best answer is to do what you do, and find a way to differentiate "bugs" and marvel at each.
Come to think of it, I did that yesterday, by telling her I like ants because they're strong, and hard workers. I said if I was an ant, I could lift a car.
Of course, if I was an ant, she would have killed me by now.
Posted by David Murray | June 14, 2007 12:36 PM
Posted on June 14, 2007 12:36
We agree (or "we reach," if you've watched too much original Star Trek). I was just coming up with a reason that was simple given the age and had an ancillary lesson. Too many years of volunteer docenting will do that to you.
Who knows, maybe we are ants to someone.
Too much Ultimate Hitchhiker's Guide.
Posted by Diane | June 14, 2007 12:41 PM
Posted on June 14, 2007 12:41
I'm calling the social workers about you, David.
Posted by Jane Greer | June 14, 2007 2:18 PM
Posted on June 14, 2007 14:18
Good things to ponder, Young Grasshopper. I once had a grasshopper show up in our house at 2 a.m. one morning and those buggers are LOUD and seeing that I value sleep above all we killed the sucker.
But I'm partial to lady bugs. I'd have to slap anyone who killed a ladybug. Go figure.
Posted by Eileen | June 14, 2007 3:03 PM
Posted on June 14, 2007 15:03
Eileen, there was a veritable pestilence of nonnative Japanese ladybugs in Chicago a couple of years ago. Slap me silly.
I once had a 45-minute standoff with a katydid. I set it outside to be one with nature. It came back in. I talked to it and set it outside. It came back in. I talked to it some more and set it outside. It came back in. Finally, I realized it wanted to watch the telly, so I let it. Eventually it got bored and left, as did I.
Posted by Diane | June 14, 2007 3:24 PM
Posted on June 14, 2007 15:24
Ok, apparently I am the ONLY one here who completely ignored David's philosophical and very valid questions because I was utterly fixated on how unbelieveably cute it was that Scout offered to apologize to the squished bug.
I did an audible AWWWWWW!!! That is adorable! Too too cute!
Personally, if I can I'll usher a bug outside. I draw the line however at many-legged "anything-pedes" particularly when they appear out of nowhere and scare the bejezus out of me. In such a case, I plead instinct as my defense for reflex "squashing"
Posted by Kristen | June 14, 2007 4:18 PM
Posted on June 14, 2007 16:18
Thanks for all these lovely tales. Perhaps my passion on this subject comes from a moment I am STILL ashamed of. I was once playing golf on a beautiful course in Hilton Head, S.C. I missed a two-foot putt. I saw red. Actually, I saw a little red bug, crawling on the green near the hole. In my rage, I slammed my putter down on the bug.
This bug died for the crime of crawling near a golf hole where a giant asshole missed a putt for par. It seemed to me like such a symbol of human self-preoccupation and recklessness and general nastiness. I still get worked up thinking about it.
I should start a Bug Rights Group, a moderate outfit that believes we should only kill bugs when they are actually bugging us.
Posted by David Murray | June 15, 2007 7:49 AM
Posted on June 15, 2007 07:49
Bad karma, dude. Go read some Kafka.
Posted by Diane | June 15, 2007 9:53 AM
Posted on June 15, 2007 09:53
Dead animals often serve very useful to humans as all fans of hamburgers and leather shoes know. But there are other uses as well. I once had a 4-year old who woudn't stop playing in the street. We tried everything to keep this kid on the sidewalk to no avail. One day I was driving with the kid in the car and saw a dead dog on the side of the road. You guessed it -- I pulled over and took my little girl by the hand and led her to the dead dog.
"Do you know why that dog is dead?"
"No, daddy, why?"
"Because he was PLAYING IN THE STREET!"
I never again had to worry about her playing in the street.
Will
Posted by Will Daniel | June 15, 2007 12:33 PM
Posted on June 15, 2007 12:33
Calling the social workers on you, too, Will Daniel.
Posted by Jane Greer | June 15, 2007 1:29 PM
Posted on June 15, 2007 13:29
I will offer the following with a caveat: I have no children so I have no experience/right/reason/call to offer advice on how to raise them. With that said, I'll dive in...
Perhaps a good starter is something along the lines of "just because you CAN do a thing doesn't mean you SHOULD." This opens the door to talk about valuing life in general (whether insect, human or other).
Of course, that's easy for me to say. I don't have to "walk the walk" after "talking the talk" with Scout. Just think how frustrated you're going to be trying to resist squashing bugs in front of her to set a good example! Your words may yet come back to bite you in the...
Posted by Vincent | June 15, 2007 10:14 PM
Posted on June 15, 2007 22:14
Cockroaches with little Beatrix Potter faces?
I had a pretty good bug-squashing eligibility checklist in my head that you've now blown all to hell, Diane. In order of importance, they were: Usefulness to humanity (and me in particular); Degree of annoyance, danger, or disease posed; venue (spiders in garden good, spiders in bathtub, bad.) And the tie breaker: are they cute?
It's all very scientific. God made good bugs cute (ladybugs, crickets, praying mantises, bumblebees, ants, etc.) and the bad ones ugly (cockroaches, flies, mosquitos with their blood-gorged bellies, etc.)
So now I have to get out a teensy little magnifying glass to check out their little expressions. Well, shoot. By then the mood will have passed.
Posted by Hammer | June 17, 2007 6:11 PM
Posted on June 17, 2007 18:11
Yes, the mood will have passed, Hammer. Because thanks to the sun's work through your magnifying glass, you will have burnt them to a cute little crisp.
I'm telling you, guys. This is a tough one.
Posted by David Murray | June 18, 2007 10:35 AM
Posted on June 18, 2007 10:35
Good point. Scratch the magnifying glass. As a society, we're far too concerned with looks anyway.
Speaking of which...what about the bugs we can't see at all? Ever think about the billions of micro-organisms our immune systems murder every day?
Let's all make ourselves crazy.
But back to your original dilemma. A simple Switzerland-like neutrality is probably the sanest approach: You don't bother me, I won't bother you--keeping in mind that the Swiss all bear arms in case someone should misunderstand the concept. Works for bugs, neighbors, in-laws, classmates, colleagues. The government? Not so much. But no plan's perfect.
Posted by Hammer | June 18, 2007 4:22 PM
Posted on June 18, 2007 16:22
Hammer, your bug policy is so pre-9/11.
Posted by David Murray | June 19, 2007 11:23 AM
Posted on June 19, 2007 11:23