The IABC International Conference is in New Orleans, June 23-27, and as usual, I'm covering the show for The Ragan Report.
My coverage usually includes a State of the IABC article, much of which is based on an interview with IABC's paid president, and the outgoing and incoming volunteer chairs.
I like to canvas IABCers and other interested parties before I arrive at the conference, to make sure I ask questions that are on their minds--not just the ones that are on mine.
Shades-of-Gray mates, what would you ask if you had an hour in a hotel suite with Julie Freeman, Glenda Holmes and Todd Hattori?
Comments (4)
Their take, reactions and response to the debates about the value, relevance and the potential development of an IABC-sponsored social network site, as represented in recent blog swirls here, on Shel Holtz' blog and elsewhere.
What the association is doing, should do, can do to advocate within the business world for the recognition of the IABC accreditation (what does it mean to a recruiting HR person or CEO that a communications candidate has ABC following their name?).
Posted by michael clendenin | June 14, 2007 11:24 AM
Posted on June 14, 2007 11:24
How IABC's core functions and structure are different now than they were 10 years ago--and how IABC leaders believe the core functions and structure will evolve into the future.
Posted by Jane Greer | June 14, 2007 2:15 PM
Posted on June 14, 2007 14:15
Given IABC's culture of consensus and caution, how will the association stay relevant in a world and a profession that is changing almost daily? Can IABC's culture keep up?
Posted by Robert J Holland, ABC | June 14, 2007 4:19 PM
Posted on June 14, 2007 16:19
Good questions, all. And asked in different ways than I would have asked them. Thanks, peeps.
Posted by David Murray | June 15, 2007 7:22 AM
Posted on June 15, 2007 07:22