The religious right's current assault on the Bush White House for sending out "holiday" instead of "Christmas" cards prompted me to dig out my own collection of White House cards from the Reagan era.
The earliest, from 1982, wishes recipients a "Joyous Christmas and a Peaceful New Year." But all the others express "holiday wishes" or "holiday greetings."
"Funny," I thought to myself. " I don't remember the religious right accusing Reagan of selling out to the dark forces of secular humanism when he and Nancy switched from 'Christmas' to 'holiday' greetings in 1983. Maybe they didn't expect much from him because he wasn't a regular churchgoer."
But Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter made the same switch in their White House cards in 1978. And there was no furor from the fundamentalists then, either -- notwithstanding the fact that Carter was an open and avowed "born again" Christian, who taught Sunday School at his local Baptist Church. (A fine example to set for the children! Leaving Baby Jesus out of the White House Christmas card!)
And yet I don't recall any protests from Carter's born-again brethren. Nobody bragged, "I threw away my White House card as soon as I got it," as did Joseph Farah, editor of WorldNetDaily.com. And nobody accused the Carters of "political correctness run amok," as did Tim Wildmon, president of the American Family Association.
The only explanation I can see for the religious right's current chorus of criticism is this: It isn't about "Keeping Christ In Christmas." It's about keeping George W's feet to the fire. The fundamentalists are convinced that they elected him and, because of that, they feel they own him. So they're spreading a little holiday fear to keep him in line -- something they never dared do with either Carter or Reagan.
Happy New Year?
Comments (4)
Geez, Bush DID say he supported the teaching of intelligent design, restrictions embroynic stem cell research, financial support of "faith-based" groups and he HAS vetted Supreme Court nominees with the fundamentalists. How much more do they want?
I find it revealing that Fox is the leading drum-beater of this ridiculous debate, yet they wish their viewers "Happy Holidays" on football broadcasts.
Posted by Dan Danbom | December 19, 2005 2:29 PM
Posted on December 19, 2005 14:29
Dan -- Remember the uproar when Bush made a feeble attempt to distance himself from the Federal Marriage Amendment? Aside from making money for them through direct mail, the "War on Christmas" gives the religious right a chance to send a message to W that he better not "go wobbly" on them.
Posted by Hal Gordon | December 19, 2005 2:42 PM
Posted on December 19, 2005 14:42
Amen.
Posted by Dan | December 19, 2005 2:48 PM
Posted on December 19, 2005 14:48
I said it last year and I'll say it again. If we stop saying, "Merry Christmas"--this year the kid who sold me a Christmas tree shook my hand and wished me a hearty "happy holidays!"--it won't be the word "Christmas" I'll miss, but the word that's truly endangered: "merry."
Unless: Merry New Year?
Posted by David Murray | December 19, 2005 7:28 PM
Posted on December 19, 2005 19:28