Are you an ethical person?
Are there any stories that we just shouldn’t bother doing in employee publications?
If you read this blog, you know where I stand on things like service anniversaries, hobby stories, baby announcements, etc. Those should be outlawed forever . . . or at least banished to HR-land.
But what about other stories . . . the stories that we sort of have to do, but that are just so boring to readers?
What about, say, Safety stories? Oh, I know we have to do those . . . but damn, are they boring. Over the years, I’ve seen thousands of safety stories. And only once or twice have they been interesting—and that was when the editor had the guts to use an anecdotal lead that featured an employee losing a limb or otherwise paying the price for ignoring safety regulations.
Usually, safety stories are either a) Boring pats on the back for going so many days without an incident; or b) Preachy stories, written by people who have never been on the factory floor, about how to act when you’re on the factory floor.
But, as boring as they are, I guess we have to do safety stories, right?
But what about ethics stories? These are the only stories out there that are more boring than safety stories. I see hundreds of these stories a year . . . and they all have the same problem: They all state the obvious, (we need to be ethical as people and as a company) and they are all way too vague about what good ethics are.
I mean, can you really tell people how to be ethical? And if someone isn’t ethical, do you think a story in the employee publication is going to turn them around?
Ethics are a tricky business, because everyone has a different idea of what being ethical means.
Here’s a story from my own life to illustrate the point:
As you know, if you read this blog, I have a six-year-old son, Zach, who serves as the vice president of human resources for Crescenzo Communications.
(As a side note, Zach attended an HR conference last week, and ever since he got back he has been on me to automate the HR function at Crescenzo Communications, and go to an all-online strategy.
“Why?” I asked him.
“Because I’m sick of dealing with all the pissing and moaning about benefits,” he said.
“What about the people who don’t have access to computers?” I asked him.
“We’ll put one of those kiosks in the kitchen, and they can use that. If they don’t want to use it, tough shit. They don’t get to enroll in the benefits plan, then.”
I figure it’s only a matter of time until I lose Zach to one of the big HR consulting firms.)
Anyway, I also have a brother, Nicky, who was born with severe cerebral palsy, and is mentally retarded and confined to a wheelchair. And every year at this time, Zach and I pick Nicky up at the facility where he lives, and the three of us and my new wife Cindy all go down to the Christmas tree lot at the end of my street to get a real tree. It’s our tradition.
Well, the guy who runs the lot charges a lot of money for his trees. Way too much money, in fact. So last year, Zach and I started working on a little routine that might help us save some money. Here is how it’s going to work this year, after Zach picks out a tree:
Christmas Tree Jerk: “Oh, that’s a nice one. That’ll be $110.”
Me: “$110? Are you kidding me? We can’t afford that.”
Zach (starting to cry, as instructed): “But Dad, you promised me we could get a tree this year. You promised that if I sold some of my toys to raise some money, we could have an actual tree to decorate, and not a plant like last year.”
Me: “I’m sorry, son. We just can’t afford it. Let's go get us a nice plant.”
At this point in the scene, I’ve instructed Nicky to start screaming and rocking in his wheelchair. Zach takes his next cue from that.
Zach (to the Christmas Tree Jerk): “Mister, can’t you help me get a tree for my crippled Uncle? This is his favorite time of the year. Can’t you please help us?”
Now, if the man can refuse a six-year-old boy and a man in a wheelchair, he deserves to get full price. My bet is that he won’t be able to, and will come down to about $60. If he doesn’t, Zach knows to take Nicky’s hat and start passing it around to random people in the tree lot, in an effort to drum up popular support and embarrass the guy into caving in.
And you know what? If the guy can resist a six-year-old kid walking around his lot, tears streaming down his face as he passes a hat, while his differently abled Uncle screams and practically rocks himself out of his wheelchair . . . then he’s got me. I’ll give him full price. But I don’t think he’ll be able to do it.
Now, some people might think that using my child this way, to say nothing of my brother, is unethical behavior. But I happen to know that the guy selling the trees owns just about the entire neighborhood. He has more money than God. And he is a pirate. He overcharges in all his stores, he’s a slumlord with his apartments, and he way overcharges for these trees.
So to me, this is war. And it’s anything goes. There are no ethics in war.
But some people would disagree with me, I am sure. And that’s the problem with ethics, and doing stories about ethics. There are no hard and fast rules, other than the obvious ones that people already know about.
And what do we gain by writing about those?