I had one of those Life Moments over the weekend that you hope to never have.
First, though, you need to understand the concept of “Fortuna’s Wheel.”
Cindy and I got the term from our favorite book, A Confederacy of Dunces. Whenever anything goes wrong for the main character, he moans that “Fortuna’s Wheel” is spinning downward . . . in other words, the fates are against him, his luck is bad, his karma is rotten, etc.
It comes from the belief that a blind goddess named Fortuna spins us on a wheel, and that both good and bad luck come in cycles. If the wheel is spinning downward, you’re in for a run of rotten luck.
Whenever things start going wrong at Crescenzo Communications, we always say that Fortuna’s Wheel is spinning downward. “We need to turn Fortuna’s Wheel around,” Cindy will say, after I miss a deadline or irritate a client.
“Fortuna’s Wheel is not in my favor,” I said, after Cindy flat out rejected Crescenzo Communications Corporate Initiative #221, otherwise known as the “Mandatory Sex During Budget Meetings Initiative.”
You get the picture.
Well, Fortuna’s Wheel had been spinning downward for the past couple of weeks. Things just didn’t seem to be going well. Nothing major . . . but a bunch of little, stupid things.
For instance, after I posted my last blog item about blogimpotence, I immediately left the house with my son to go to our boat on Chicago’s Lakefront. The plan was to camp there for two days—what we call a “City Vacation.”
But, being an insecure blogger, while there I was also using my Dingleberry to check to see if anyone commented on the blog. And . . . nobody had. The item had been live for seven hours, and not one single comment.
Of course, I blamed it on Fortuna’s Wheel . . . and not the fact that I had alienated my entire audience by not posting for a week and a half.
But then . . . as always happens, Fortuna’s Wheel started to spin upwards. First, on our way over to Lincoln Park to play baseball, Zach and I happened to notice that admittance to the Nature Museum was free that day . . . and that they were feeding the water snakes! So we got to watch a bunch of snakes in a feeding frenzy, swallowing whole live goldfish. Totally awesome, and very lucky for us that we noticed the sign, that the museum was free, and that we made it in time for the snake feeding. Fortuna’s Wheel started to nudge a little.
Then, when I got back to the boat, I got an e-mail from my friend Elaine, who said she had tried to comment on the blog all day and couldn’t!
It wasn’t me . . . it was the technology! Ragan immediately fixed the problem, and when I woke up Friday morning, there were 17 of the nicest comments anyone could ever hope for. Fortuna’s Wheel was spinning wildly upwards. I could feel it spinning!
Then Zach woke up and told me he wants to sleep on the boat whenever he’s in Chicago. Since I, too, want to sleep on the boat every night I’m in Chicago, this was terrific news.
At one point that morning, I decided that Fortuna’s Wheel couldn’t be any more in our favor. Zach was feeding a tribe of fuzzy baby ducks off the back end of the boat. I had bacon and eggs cooking on the camp stove in the galley. There was a pot of good Guatemalan coffee perking. After breakfast, we were going to walk down to Taste of Chicago, one of our favorite things in the world to do.
And I distinctly remember thinking: “This is why you work. This is what life is about. It doesn’t get any better than this.” The only thing missing was martinis . . . and sometimes, you don’t even need those.
Just then the phone rang. Caller ID told me it was my sister, who was meeting us at the Taste with her daughter. I answered the phone exactly like this:
“There is no better place in the world than right here, in the harbor, right now. I’ve got bacon and eggs on the stove, coffee in hand, the birds are darting around, the weather is perfect, now get your ass down here and take a bite out of paradise.”
“Yeah . . . uh . . . Tommy died last night,” my sister said.
It was one of those moments that change your life forever . . . an exact moment of time you know you will never forget. A frozen moment, I heard someone call them once.
Tommy is my cousin. Was my cousin. He was my 37-year-old cousin with a five-year-old daughter and a two-year-old son. He had been battling cancer for a year, and last week he went through a bone marrow transplant.
He had been doing as well as could be expected. The e-mail updates from his wife were positive, and full of hope. He was about one day away from getting out of the hospital and moving in with his mom for a while.
And then he suddenly took a turn for the worse and we lost him.
Right about the time I was worried that nobody was commenting on my stupid blog, Tommy was losing the battle for his life.
The very minute that I was feeling as happy as I could feel, people I love were in agony. Talk about feeling like a shallow, rotten person. Talk about reordering your priorities.
I know I had nothing to do with his turn for the worse, obviously . . . . but does anyone else believe that if you publicly acknowledge how happy you are, you’re asking for trouble?
Does anyone else feel that if there is in fact a God, it’s a mean, spiteful God who looks for true happiness so that he can squelch it? Maybe I’m being superstitious; maybe I’m just being stupid. But from now on, when Fortuna’s Wheel is spinning in my favor, I’m going to keep it to my damn self.
Comments (86)
Hey Steve,
I think we've all had similar moments. I once spent the better part of a week bitching and moaning because my new laptop wasn't burning DVDs properly. I made a really big deal about it. Then I heard from a friend of mine that his four-year-old niece's leukaemia had returned. I rightly felt like a jackass.
I'm not sure what my point is, but don't be too hard on yourself.
My condolences.
Posted by Jim Harris | July 10, 2006 11:51 PM
Posted on July 10, 2006 23:51
Steve, first of all, condolences about your cousin. What an awful loss.
Did you by any chance have a Catholic education? I hate to generalize, but I find that those of us who (often) suffered at the hands of the good nuns and brothers have a skewed sense of karma. Just last week, a good friend of mine who accidentally injured herself believed that the cut and resulting infection (which required hospitalization) were somehow connected to the fun weekend she had just enjoyed. Yes, she and I had attended Catholic school together for eight years.
A Confederacy of Dunces is also one of my favourite books. Maybe it's Ignatius's lament about Fortuna that makes it such an enticing read. But please, Steve, don't think that your happiness is in any way connected to someone else's pain! If someone had called to tell you they just won the lottery, would you have found a link there?? ;-)))
Posted by Donna Papacosta | July 11, 2006 6:15 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 06:15
Jim and Donna:
Thanks for the kind condolences. I know, I know . . . I'm not being too hard on myself . . . it was just an awful moment, and awful feeling, that I hope to never repeat.
Yes, Donna, I WAS raised Catholic. I blame the Catholic Church for so much, I don't mind piling this "fear of feeling good about life and yourself" onto the pile, either. I'm sure they had something to do with it.
My dream, when I lay down to sleep at night, is that one day, the Vatican will be brought before the UN and tried for crimes against humanity.
But that's just me.
Thanks again for the kind words.
Steve C.
Posted by Steve C. | July 11, 2006 6:55 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 06:55
Steve:
I don't specifically refer to Fortuna's Wheel but rather the gigantic Wheel of Karma.
Eventually the big Wheel 'o Karma will roll back around. And crush you underneath it.
Sorry about your cuz. Take care of the wife and kids. In the immortal words of Warren Zevon, "Enjoy every sandwich."
Posted by t2ed | July 11, 2006 7:04 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 07:04
Sorry about your loss Steve. Part of life is death and until it hits a little close to home, you really don’t think too much about it.
You say you know what life is all about and why you work, and I think you did in fact find the meaning of life. It’s a shame that you can’t have happiness all the time but happiness comes in small doses, time with your son, a good cup of Guatemalan coffee or Corporate Initiative #221 being initiated etc. This is what make those moment memorable.
Yeah being raised Catholic has kind of taught me that what ever I do no matter what, I’m going to hell. You kind of distance yourself from those silly beliefs once you’re old enough to think for yourself.
My wife lives kind of by her own Newton's Third Law of Karma. For every bad thought or action there will be an equal bad action toward her. If I mutter something negative about some idiot on the road, my wife will immediately tell me to “Be Quiet! Don’t talk that way before our vacation.” I just know there is good and bad and hopefully not to much bad. You can certainly make decision that affects your life dramatically in a positive or negative way but death is inevitable for everything on earth.
Steve, remember you have millions of readers and your first thought should always be a technology problem. Technology is great when it works!
Posted by AN | July 11, 2006 7:22 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 07:22
While I, too, am so sorry for your loss, I think you can't stop enjoying life (and while I didn't know your cousin I will guess he would want his family/friends to grab onto everything it offers with both hands?).
I am also so reassured to discover that I am not the only "reformed Catholic" out there. I am reconciled to going to hell no matter what according to Rome's rules, so I intend to enjoy every damn minute until then! I think we all should, and without any apologies.
My own philosopy of life tends toward something called "the rule of three" which states that everything you do, think or wish (both bad and good) comes back to you times three. I like this because it puts me in charge instead of "Fortuna". If I think good stuff, I usually get good stuff back. If I'm a cranky bitch, ya well, tomorrow's another day! But we can't control everything, so rolling with those punches is sometimes the best you can do.
Steve - know your little community is thinking of you and wishing you condolences
Posted by Kristen | July 11, 2006 7:59 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 07:59
I was not raised Catholic, as you know, Steve. My God is a loving God who wants us to be happy. Sometimes the path to being eternally happy includes moments like that when we're faced with the pain and imperfection of this life on earth. How can we know happiness if we don't have some sadness to compare it with?
I've had many moments like the one you described (and please accept my condolences on your loss, too). But looking back on them, I realize they were also the best times of my life. You can't forge iron without fire.
Posted by Robert J Holland | July 11, 2006 8:21 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 08:21
Hi, Steve:
Sorry for your loss. I've atually cracked a folder titled "Friends and relatives: Disease, depression, death, debt, and divorce." It's pretty full.
The Buddha writes that "Existence is sufering," and Cardinal Bernadin used to observe that "All lessons in life are learned at the foot of the Cross."
It must seem that suffering is the natural condition and that happiness is a transitory event and a matter of chance. But my best friend - a priest who died while saying mass in Michigan last March - once told me that simply to be aware that you're alive - here, now - is to be happy. "Existence is ecstacy."
"We must imagine Sysiphus as happy" - Camus
Suffering can numb us - or shock us into consciousness and the necessity to love as an act of praise. Read "Lear."
Call me before you go to Poland,
Patrick
Posted by patrick williams | July 11, 2006 9:19 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 09:19
Steve,
I'm so sorry about your cousin. Please don't be hard on yourself...I'm sure your cousin would not want you to beat yourself up over this. While I'm not Catholic, I have experienced that same kind of guilt when getting bad news while extremely happy.
And I admit, I have moments when I question why God allows certain things to happen, such as both my paternal grandparents dying at Thanksgiving three years apart and my maternal grandmother dying at Christmas. It makes me nervous as the holidays approach, even though they have always been my favorite time of year. It's like you don't want to enjoy them too much just in case.
The best thing you can do is to cherish the good memories you have of your cousin and make sure to share them with his wife and children. And continue to enjoy the sweet moments of life, out on your boat with Jake.
Hugs,
Sonya
Posted by Sonya | July 11, 2006 9:42 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 09:42
Hi, again, Steve:
Wanted to say a word on the anti-Catholic strain in some of the comments, as I sympathize with them, and have, actually, lived them, as a child and adolescent, and am shamed by the priest scandal and the incompetence of some of our teachers and pastors in our pre-Vatican II youth.
But we're not kids any more. Nixon's corruption didn't mean you throw out the Constitution; Enron's corruption doesn't mean businesses don't provide useful services.
I've been a practicing Catholic all my life, more than a half-century, and what I'd say is that the center of the faith is the life of Christ as presented in the gospels, especially the mandate to serve the poor, and the sacramental re-enactiment of Christ's life in the Mass and eucharist. What Catholics believe is codified in the Creed, which has little to do with the comments you usually read.
You want to talk about Catholicism? Start with the life of Christ, the gospels, the sacraments and the missions - not some grudge against an uneducated, possibly frustrated teacher who yelled at you in Junior High. We were victims then; we're responsible adults now. I know of no other organization that does more for the poor - here and abroad - than the Catholic Church.
It strikes me a recidivist that some people think they're going to a place called "hell" after they die. What hell? Where? Down some place? Down where?
Heaven or hell are here and now, not some surprise that will come when you die.
So, it's easy to satirize the Ratzinger papacy and nurse childhood wounds inflicted by ignorant people in positions of authority - which, I acknowledge, are real and in too many cases permanent. I'm a member of that club, and as pointed in my criticisms and as public in advocating the need to reform as anyone I know, inside or outside the church. But I'm not, as the last permissable prejudice has it, "a recovering Catholic." I'm grateful for the gift of faith and the call to service that came to me through the Curch.
Put another way, I remember something a Methodist minister once told me: "We're not good to the poor in hopes that some day we'll see the face of God. We're good to the poor because - at that moment - we're seeing the face of God." I never would have arrived at that insight without the gift of faith and the competent teaching of Chistian educators.
So, I read the Tribune and lower my face into my palms at each new disclosure in the history of clerical sexual abuse and anti-feminist canonical legislation. It outrages me. But I also can walk outside my door in Chicago - any time, any day - and see the face of God and discover the universal vocation, the call to serving the poor, as transmitted to us from the source of all vocations.
That's what it means to be a Catholic, and I'm proud - actually, grateful, rather than proud - to be a Catholic,
Patrick
Posted by patrick williams | July 11, 2006 10:25 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 10:25
Steve -
Hugs to you and yours and my condolences on the passing of your cousin.
I wasn't raised Catholic but that doesn't mean that I don't often feel as though I have a giant bull-eye on my back. There's so much needless suffering in the world it's hard not to wonder what kind of diety could allow it. That's part of being human.
But as I read your story, I found myself thinking that the good feeling you were experiencing might have come from cousin. Not to get all "Ghost Whisperer" but my particular philosphical/religious tradition teaches that the only thing that is truly real is the love we give and the love we receive, so who's to say that on his way to whatever comes next, Tommy didn't stop by and smile knowing that for a brief moment you truly understood what life was about while you were still alive to enjoy it.
Just a thought...
Posted by marcia | July 11, 2006 10:50 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 10:50
Patrick, I have to thank you for such a candid and heartfelt comment on your faith. It's refreshing to see someone who is not apologetic for their beliefs and for their participation in an imperfect institution (as is everything run by imperfect humans).
I practice my faith in a Baptist church, which immediately causes most people to groan and roll their eyes and make all kinds of assumptions about me that simply are not true. It seems to me that nothing has done more to cause people to run from God than religion. It has always been so. Even Jesus Christ himself fought most vigorously with the religious leaders of his day; by contrast he was most comfortable (and most effective in his ministry) when hanging out with the lowest members of society - the fishermen, the tax collectors, the prostitutes.
Back to the point, what is the purpose of pain and suffering? To guilt us into a relationship with God? No, that's not the way God works. We make it so complicated, but it's really pretty simple. We live in an imperfect world, full of pain and suffering, but also full of joy if we choose to see it. My outlook on the pain and suffering is that it draws me closer to God, who is always there to wrap his loving arms around me, to comfort me and forgive me. And then he wants me to do the same thing to others. Just like we're doing for you here, Steve.
"And that's what Christmas is all about, Charlie Brown."
Posted by Robert J Holland | July 11, 2006 11:03 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 11:03
Steve - my condolences to you and your family in your hours of grief.
I am a strong believer in karma - something I gained from studying, of all things, Wiccan. They believe in something called the 3-fold law. Whatever you do in this life, good or bad, comes back to you three-fold. Growing up Catholic and currently a practicing Lutheran, I still believe very much in God and Christ and the words that the Bible contain. I don't find it against my faith in the very least to have studied the principles of wiccan - or my belief in the 3-fold rule.
I find Patrick's words refreshing as I am tired of people blaming their "Catholic upbringing" for their guilt and utter lack of faith in their lives. I'm really sorry some people had a bad Catholic experience, but my God is not a knuckle-rapping enforcer of fire and brimstone, but rather a promoter of proceeding in faith to love people, and compassionately walk the earth.
So Steve - maybe you just need to look at it another way. This isn't about you. Death isn't about the living, despite what the funeral directors tell you. It's about life. Focus positively on that one trait that your cousin had that you would most like to emulate. That's his life. That's your karma. That's what changes Fortuna's wheel. That's what comes back to you 3-fold as you enjoy a beautiful evening on a boat with your son, and the joy you put on his face as you feed the snakes.
Posted by Rebecca (token IT Goddess) | July 11, 2006 11:29 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 11:29
Hi, Robert:
Thanks for you well-considered and insightful comments.
I recall an interview Malcolm Muggeridge did with William Buckley on Buckley's "Firing Line" some years back, after his conversion to Catholicism. One point he made is that the only way we learn is through suffering. C.S. Lewis, after the death of his wife ("The Problem of Pain" - have you see "Shadowlands" with Anthony Hopkins and Debra Winger?) makes the same point: Suffering is the anvil on which God's shapes us to His will.
So, it's an invitation. But it's real. Like Samson at Gaza, we embrace suffering, and triumph if we can find the purpose and meaning in its inescapable presence.
Quae nocent docent - am I right?
Patrick
Posted by patrick williams | July 11, 2006 11:39 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 11:39
I was raised Catholic but am now a quasi-practicing Methodist expat living Italy. The Italians have no qualms about combining religion and superstitions. They BELIEVE in the evil-eye and hexes and have elaborate rituals for their cure. When someone greets you asking: Come sta? (how are you?) it's considered bad luck to say you are doing well. All this is the heartland of THE religion!
Me? I believe life is hard (Peck-ism). ANYTIME it's good, even tiny-little things, you should be thankful and celebrate, unabashedly and LOUDLY. Right now I'm dancing with joy over this excellent glass of vino! WOO-WHOO!!
Posted by Suzanne Salvo | July 11, 2006 11:51 AM
Posted on July 11, 2006 11:51
Hey Suzanne,
It's no coincidence that Jesus' first miracle was turning water to wine! He was just keeping the party going.
Enjoy the vino!
Robert
Posted by Robert J Holland | July 11, 2006 2:26 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 14:26
My condolences. We don't (or more to the point, shouldn't) grieve for those who died - if they were suffering, it has ended. But for those living with the loss, well, mere words don't suffice.
==
My position on the philosophical issues here are clear. There is no luck, no karma, no god (or as I'll say in more flippant times, No Santa Claus for Adults). There are things that happen outside - or in spite of - our control, of course. As humans we love to look for reasons, and connections, and we love to retrofit and rationalize. All of which is perfectly healthy and can serve a purpose - especially as part of the grieving process.
My uncle, who died a few years ago, was a calligrapher. Ive got a number of his things hanging in my house. The two that are relevant to this conversation (and apologies for not knowing the sources offhand, being here at work): "I will always cry a little because I miss him; I will always laugh a little because I knew him" and the real capper: "Time goes you say? Ah no, alas. Time stays. We go." The latter is half inked, half pencil - his having died before finishing it.
Posted by Neruda | July 11, 2006 2:39 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 14:39
Well, I don't much care to have my faith reduced to a belief in "Santa Claus for Adults" because the way I've experienced it is very real. But, hey, I'm also not one to tell other people how they should live.
I promised David Murray I would use the word "fart" in a comment in this thread, just to try to bring the discussion out of such seriousness and to a less mature place. Otherwise we might lose our audience. So there. I've said it. "Fart." David Murray made me do it.
Posted by Robert J Holland | July 11, 2006 2:52 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 14:52
Robert: It was your idea, fartface.
Posted by David Murray | July 11, 2006 3:11 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 15:11
Ah, no offense intended, Robert. I am very well grounded in the avenues of faith, having spent 12 years in Catholic school, alter boy, all that jazz. And no, nothing untoward ever happened to turn me away.
But nor did I ever feel - or sense or touch or experience - anything to lead me to accept that
anything beyond the bounds of earthly explanation was going on.
As a philosophy and a moral grounding it works ok, but as fact or fundamental reality, at least for me, not so much. But many people either require or desire it in their lives, for many different reasons. My parents among them. I'm cool with that.
I kinda wish people would stop killing each other in their god's name, but that's for another discussion.
In context, I believe the approriate joke would have included a reference to "going over like a fart in church" but I can forgive the transgression!
Posted by Neruda | July 11, 2006 3:14 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 15:14
The fact that you were celebrating life and love and family when your cousin's life was ending shouldn't make you feel guilty.Those happy moments are what we cling to when someone we love dies. Someday when you're gone your son will console himself with happy memories of time on the lake with Dad. And wouldn't your cousin have been looking down on you enjoying your celebration?
The fact that you were living life to the fullest while his was ending has a kind of beautiful balance to it, for the same reasons that people like to see babies at funerals. It's a good reminder that no matter how crummy and unfair a death may be, there is life and beauty and promise all around us.
Posted by Margaret Denihan | July 11, 2006 4:07 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 16:07
Ohhh, Steve, I'm sorry. I think that day you had was the perfect microcosm of the human experience. It's great and it sucks and nothing ever happens when you're ready for it. And all those emotions can beat you senseless but the alternative is feeling nothing. And then you'd just be...the Vice President.
(Ducking).
In any case, I'm a recovering Catholic, too, but I'll let that topic die a spiritual though guilt-ridden death.
Take care.
Sister Mary Bumptious
Posted by Meredith | July 11, 2006 5:15 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 17:15
Steve----it's not easy to think of one of my favorite funny people in such a sad place, but it happens to everyone at some time, and it takes a certain trust to share that sort of pain with other people. Thank you for doing that, and I'm sorry for your loss.
2004 was a year of shit for me from one end to the other. I had a miscarriage in January. My dog drowned in the pool on the 4th of July. My beloved mother-in-law died on the table during heart surgery a week before Thanksgiving. The irony of that year is that I started seeing a therapist after just the miscarriage, because I was afraid I couldn't handle the grief...dead dogs and mother-in-laws were still to come for me.
The therapist admonished me not to compare my pain to others----if it sucked, it sucked in its own right, and I would eventually learn to accept the loss on its own, but never by thinking I shouldn't feel so bad because others have suffered worse.
What I took away from that was how to handle both happy and sad things--If something great happens to you, celebrate it and don't feel guilty. Your joy in life could be an inspiration to someone having a crappy time. And if something crappy happens to you, do two things: honestly grieve it, but make sure to move on as well.
I don't think we get any points in life--or help someone who's suffered--by feeling less good about something that ought to be celebrated. Sonya's comment is really important: "The best thing you can do is to cherish the good memories you have of your cousin and make sure to share them with his wife and children." That is the best way to honor his memory, as well as to help yourself heal.
OK, the meandering soapbox hour is now over---back to work for me!
Posted by Laurel | July 11, 2006 5:20 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 17:20
See . . .this is what sucks about this blog. From my perspective, anyway.
I was gone all day today, at the funeral. I just got back, and now there are 20 unbelievable responses. And I can't respond to all of them.
It's like being in a conversation with 20 people at once, and they are all saying interesting things, and you have to carry on the conversations all at once.
But it ISN'T like that . . .because that never happens in real time! If you're in a conversation with 20 people in real life, odds are 5 of them are borderline retarded, 5 of them are just plain stupid, three of them have a screwed up world view that makes them impossible to talk to, and maybe two of them are interesting.
Out here, it's all of the good people in one place. Even David, with his gratuitous use of the "f" word.
What a terrific thread. There's so much here, I want to re-run it in Ragan Report, as a case study in the kind of conversations blogs COULD start, when thinking people participate.
Maybe I'll do just that . . . with no names attached, of course.
Steve C.
Posted by Steve C. | July 11, 2006 5:40 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 17:40
Patrick, Robert, et al:
Please don't think that I take someone else's faith for granted. I don't. I'm envious of people who have it.
At the funeral today, all the homilies and speeches had the same theme: Don't grieve. If you have faith, then you're going to see Tommy again. Tommy is in a better place. Tommy is the lucky one. It was Tommy's time to come home.
Etcetera, etcetera.
For those people who do have faith, it must be an unbelievable comfort to them, and I envy them that.
I don't have it, but that's my problem.
BUT . . . Patrick . . . the Cathlolic Church is another argument. I don't hate the Catholic Church because of some decades-old-long grudge.
I was never diddled as an altar boy (and yes, I was an altar boy). I'm not bitter because they taught me that God is a mean God, that he was nailed to a cross because of ME, that I was born with some kind of crazy "original sin," or any of that shit.
I now see, as an adult, how patently ridiculous it all is, and I'm shocked that people still fall for it, and still go to church and do the medieval chanting and such . . . . but to each his own.
My problem with the Catholic Church is RIGHT NOW.
There are so, so many areas we could explore . . . but let's take one example: You say they do more for the poor than anyone else.
What about the poor Catholics in places like Mexico and South America and Ireland, who are told that birth control is a sin against God, and as a result have five, six, seven kids they can't afford?
Is it in the Bible that birth control is bad? Did Jesus say it? No . . . the Catholic Church came up with that one on its own, and we all know why: money.
They want to create more Catholics. So, while it's an absolute sin for a non-married couple to have safe sex, or a homosexual couple to have safe sex . . . it's perfectly acceptable for a couple, as long as they married, to have a bunch of kids they can't support.
I don't remember that being in the Gospels.
You mentioned the raging sexism in the Catholic Church, so I won't bother with that. How anyone, as a citizen of the modern world, can accept that, is beyond me.
One other thing is worth mentioning: You talked about the sex scandal, and the fact that the Church knowingly shuffled hundreds if not thousands of pedophiles from church to church.
If that's not enough to get them before the UN, I don't know what is.
But the real scandal is that they STILL refuse to let priests marry. They refuse to let them live normal lives.
And why? Is it somewhere in the Bible that priests can't marry? Did Jesus say it? I don't think so.
That priests must remain unmarried is a Catholic Church thing, with nothing to do with the Bible. And why do they do it?
Because if priests marry, the Church is going to have to pay them more, because it costs money to raise a family. If priests marry, they are going to want to leave their earthly belongings to their families, instead of the church.
As with almost everything else with the Catholic Church, it comes down to not religion, or faith, but money. They have perverted the Bible, and the memory of Jesus, to fill their coffers.
I agree with you: If people would live their lives modeled after Jesus, the world would be a better place.
But where we differ is that I think the Catholic Church is about as far away from Jesus' teachings as you can possibly get.
In fact, if Jesus were around today, how much do you want to bet HE wouldn't be a Catholic?
I leave you with something a hard-core Christian said to me once. She has no love for the Catholic Church, either:
"Go into any non-Catholic Church and what do you see? A cross. Just a simple cross. Nobody's on it. But go into any Catholic Church, and what do you see? A cross with a bloody, broken Jesus on it. Why is that? Because every other Christian faith is about hope. It's about the fact that yes, Jesus suffered and died, but that's over. It's about redemption, and support. But with the Catholics, they leave Jesus ON the cross, because the entire religtion is about guilt. It's about reminding you that you fucked up, and that you're still fucking up. It's how they control people, and with them it's all about control."
Steve C.
Steve C.
Posted by Steve C. | July 11, 2006 6:05 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 18:05
Well, on the issue of birth control, Steve, most practicing Catholics in industrialized nations practice birth control, realize that the Church's official position is wrong, and receive the sacraments with a clear conscience. The problem with overpopulation among the poor and in underdeveloped countries isn't the church's ban on birth control - since many non-Catholics, here and abroad, have a problem with over-population because of lack of information and medical resources, which is, in my opinion, the problem.
I think most Catholics, including some members of the clergy, and including me, would like to see women ordained, and a married clergy, at least as an option. I also think loving and responsible pre-marital, technically "extra-marital," and homosexual sex and homosexual marriage fall well within the embrace of Christ's love. I think most Catholics I know would agree. I'm not sure where you're getting your information. You can't get a clear sense of the church from the media any more than you'd get a clear view of what average Americans think by watching those CNN shouting matches.
I haven't met a practicing Catholic in 40 years who thinks hell is a "place" you can be "sent to" or believes in some notion of "absolute mortal sin," except, perhaps, in the case of sociopathology, which might be understood better from a medical than a religious perspective.
I think you're defining the church too narrowly as the Vatican, the hierarchy, historical error, and, in some instances, the clergy. That's simply a distaste for politically corrupt and entrenched power structures. I share that distaste and your outrage.
But the real church is in the pews, just as the real America isn't in Washington, but in the citizen who believes all people are created equal, government by the consent of the governed, constitutional freedoms, and the like.
But I'd stand by my point about the church's service to the poor - no one does more. As one example, in the West, Catholic Relief Services feed half the population of Haiti. The Church is much more like Mother Teresa than you portray it, at least in my experience.
So I agree with you on the the lack of scriptural authority for a lot of the idiocy you describe, accurately, in my view. But I do differ with you on your friend's point of Catholics leaving Jesus on the Cross. At least the pews were fuller when I went last Easter than on Good Friday.
Patrick
Posted by patrick williams | July 11, 2006 7:30 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 19:30
Patrick:
Points well taken. I do agree . . . Catholics, on their own, do a lot of good. The Catholic School system is a good one. Many parishes are wonderful support systems and communities.
I'm wrong to say I hate "the Catholic Church." You said it best: I hate the "politically corrupt and entrenched power structure" that is the "official" Catholic Church.
But all those good Catholics we both know and love need to grow a set. Too many of them meekly follow the rules coming out of the Vatican. You obviously give these issues a lot of thought . . . but for every one Patrick Williams, unfortunately, there are thousands of Catholic sheep who are unwilling to stand up and question the "rules" that have been outdated since the turn of the last century.
They just simply have to ordain women, let priests marry, and knock off the bias against homosexuals.
There is a critical shortage of priests, isn't there? Where Zach goes to school (yes, he goes to a Catholic school; when you get divorced, you lose some decision-making power, and that is one battle I lost; it will be a real challenge for me, as I want to encourage him to seek spirituality, learn all he can from Jesus . . . but without succumbing to the Catholic brainwashing that still goes on) they have a TERRIFIC priest.
I've had to sit through some masses, because Zach was involved (he did a reading for one, and was a St. for All Saints Day for another), and this guy is just wonderful.
But guess what? He's leaving. He's going to Joliet, because there's a pastor there with no priest. It's his fourth move in three years.
When good priests keep getting kicked around because there aren't enough good priests, and the church still won't ordain women or allow priests to marry (which, I believe, is still out of pure greed), there's a real problem.
Of course, all of this is written with the knowledge that Steve Crescenzo arguing religion with Patrick Williams is like Truman Capote going 15 rounds with Joe Frazier.
But it won't be the first time I got my ass kicked.
Steve C.
Posted by Steve C. | July 11, 2006 9:23 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 21:23
This continues to be interesting. Patrick, here is where I disagree with you. The CATHOLIC church is against birth control, against sex outside of their definition of marriage, against homosexuality and on and on. The fact that you know many catholics who, like you, disagree with those tenets makes you wise.
It also makes you a bad catholic. They like people who play ball their way.
Holding the beliefs you do may make you a good christian and a good human being, but the church is what it is. And causes its share of problems in addition to the good works. You can't explain that away with good intentions.
As a catholic, I can't pick and choose which commandments to follow, can I? Even if most people I know believe as I believe, and agree with me, we cant just decide to ignore numbers 3,5 and 8, can we? ( side note - I challenged one of my still practicing Catholic friends to rattle off the 10 commandments - and no , I dont remember how in the world we got on that subject - and when he couldn't, he told me in no uncertain terms that well, he knows the IMPORTANT ones.)
Hey, wasn't it people en masse disagreeing with the Catholic church that got us Protestants? And still the Catholic church ambles merrily forward...
Posted by Neruda | July 11, 2006 9:57 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 21:57
Hi, Neruda and Steve:
Well, I'd say that to be a member of the Catholic Church you should subscribe to the Creed, sometimes called the Nicene Creed - accessible easily on line. The Ten Commandments aren't in there, though I also subscribe to those. Assuming Catholics should be able to recite the Ten Commandments reveals an anti-Catholic prejudice, though I think everyone should know the Decalogue - I do.
Hey, Neruda, you know the Bill of Rights? Let's have 'em - or are you not an American?
But this other stuff about obeying all the rules rather than picking and choosing or having to leave, or the "Church" as liking lock-step obedience or my being something called a "bad Catholic" by someone you call "they."
I honestly don't know what you're referring to. It simply doesn't describe my experience or the experience of any Catholic I've ever known. It's just an anti-Catholic bias: "They demand blind obedience or you're out." That's simply not the case. I don't know where you're getting your information, though I suspect it's from former Catholics.
I would say, simply, that a Christian is someone who lives his life in the compelling memory of Christ's words and actions, and that a Catholic is a particular type of Christiian, who traces the tradition of his faith to the apostles.
All this other stuff - it's just the usual anti-Catholic crap hung on shreds of selective evidence - selected, I assume, to suport a pre-conceived point, for what reasons I wouldn't speculate. But your descriptions on the Catholic Church are alien to my experience.
My brotherly love and affection,
Patrick
Posted by patrick williams | July 11, 2006 10:31 PM
Posted on July 11, 2006 22:31
The bottom line of all of this is that our intelligence, reasoning and philosophy only take us so far, then faith either is discarded or embraced.
Jesus used irony throughout the New Testament to show us how nothing is at it seems. That "we see through a glass dimly" while we're on earth. He took the old "law" and turned it on his ear. He told the Jew to love a Samaritan. He told his followers that the first will indeed be the last. The meek will rule the earth. He told riddles to get us to think.
Is it because he's mean? No. It's because he's drawing us to him - to be MORE curious. To be MORE in awe. To realize that the answers are found in him. And the best surprise? That those with faith in him will die only to wake up in a place better than we can humanly imagine. He's brilliant.
The best example of this is Joseph and his "cool coat of color." His brothers toss him in a hole, leave him for dead, and tell his dad he was eaten alive by animals. In the end is he mad? Hell, yeah. But he also admits, "Although you meant it for evil God meant it for good." It's not God who threw him in the hole. But it IS God who redeemed the whole experience by taking him to Egypt and making him king.
It's not God who causes death, he allows death so he can walk with us (and Tommy) into eternity. The story, alas, has a good ending. And that's where hope comes in.
Posted by Eileen | July 12, 2006 1:17 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 01:17
There seems to be an unnecessary debate about the Catholic religion going on here. I think everyone understands that there is a difference between right and wrong and the fact that there is wrong in the church, any church. People are bad, have bad thoughts and do bad things, but not all of them and this doesn’t make an organization bad because of them. Like I said, once I was old enough to figure out for myself that a lot of what I was taught was silly I was okay with it. I knew that my god wouldn’t send someone to hell because they didn’t believe; even if they were some uncivilized, never heard of people in the middle of nowhere that was never taught about Jesus Christ or The Father.
I wanted to have my two daughters baptized by the church and I had to meet with the pastor of St. James Cal Sag or better know as “Monks Castle” where the monks come out at might and capture you and torture you in the basement.
He wasted no time telling me first that I needed to be married in the church and that it would cost money and then the baptisms could take place afterwards for money. I left there mad because at the time I couldn’t afford to have my children saved, but knew that he was probably just getting to the point and I was glad no more of my time was wasted. I was doing it for my Irish Catholic Grandmother anyway. I opted to have my cousin Richie (Fr. Rich) baptize them in a river in South Bend IN along with my niece.
I remember going to a funeral and my brother didn’t get up for communion and I later asked him why. He said he felt a little awkward because he didn’t really believe in the whole process and that you can’t receive if you sinned and so on and that he is more like an atheist than anything else. He did this for a few more times and I could see that he was uncomfortable just sitting there while the whole very Catholic family was receiving the Holy Eucharist. I told him if he didn’t believe then why would you care about eating a little wafer thing. He’s been eating Christ ever since.
It’s easy to debate religion because most people have different views and different faiths. I have no religion but I will always claim to be a part time Catholic. I teach my kids right from wrong and I openly talk to them about why we don’t go to church.
Jesus said, "I am the light that is over all things. I am all: from me all came forth, and to me all attained.
Split a piece of wood; I am there.
Lift up the stone, and you will find me there."
I believe that you need no church but you only need to believe. God is everywhere, not just in a church where you have to pay money to hear the same gospels over and over and over and over. Church is the only place that repeatedly makes me sick to my stomach and make me want to faint. (Yes I was also an alter boy.)
There is a Baptist church a mile from my house that is huge! The guy that delivers UPS at my work is real big in that church but only for political reasons. This church has two jet planes that are use to travel to Monday night football games. The lowest salary is 70k and they are trying to buy the local theater across the street for $12 million in order to have more parking for more patrons who will give more money. Separate church and state and make churches pay taxes already.
Now for whatever church you belong to there will be rules. I believe these rules were put in place because people were getting out of control. There were some people out there that decided in order to be a more civilized society that there would have to be rules and fear. You can see even today that laws, the death penalty and prison just isn’t enough to keep people on the strait and narrow. But the fear of suffering for eternity kept most of us from living the life of crime or living without a conscience.
Wow I’ve rambled on and on about this but it’s difficult to make a quick point about this subject. I don’t fear death because I think I’m a good person. Even if I like the neighbors sport car or took some printer paper home from work. My God doesn’t punish he forgives, so there can’t be a hell.
There were a lot of good points made here and I think it’s pretty wild how Steve’s feelings of Fortuna's Wheel turned into a conversation about Catholics and religion.
Posted by AN | July 12, 2006 6:22 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 06:22
Ah, the power of a well-written blog.
Just have to say to Eileen that you summarized my Christian experience better than I could summarize it myself. That's what keeps me engaged (to use a phrase we're all familiar with) in my spiritual journey.
Posted by Robert J Holland | July 12, 2006 6:49 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 06:49
I thought I would keep my trap shut on the subject, but I just can't.
I love how those who don't attend church justify it by saying "God is everywhere" - this is true. The church has those that God has not and God has those that the Church has not...this is also very true.
In the same breath you say every church has rules, and this is also true. One of those rules is to attend church. "They" didn't make up these rules, Christ outlines the need to worship with others very clearly in Scripture.
Pray at home, and see what feeling you get. Now pray and sing in the company of the church on Sunday and tell me it doesn't change the experience for you. You are meant to be cradled in the arms of your fellow Christians while you pray to the one who gives and who has given you everything. Christian worship isn't only about praying to God or asking forgiveness...it's about living the life the way Christ would live...the ever famous WWJD. It's about the constant reminder and acknowledgement of your faith. And that involves public worship.
And don't reduce it to money. Nothing is free. The church still has to pay the bills. Mine gives me a monthly statement including the mortgage, electricity, pastor's salary, gas...their doors are always open whether they receive their monthly collection needs or not. There are still volunteers for Sunday School, there are still weekly suppers before Lenten and Advent services. Find me another institution who serves you if you don't pay. You're not paying for Christ's love, you're paying to keep the doors open for collective public worship.
Posted by Rebecca (token IT Goddess) | July 12, 2006 8:17 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 08:17
Steve, my condolences on your loss. Maybe it will help to think about things this way...
Sometimes, bad things happen. I believe that life is what you make of it and that the human condition is what WE ALL make of it. Heaven and Hell are both here on earth, right now, made by us humans. So in a way, on the day your cousin died, you were experiencing both Heaven (your glorious day with your son) and Hell (the unspeakable loss of your cousin.)
Take comfort in the fact that to me and all your loyal readers, you are a part of our "Heaven" because through your blog you bring us valuable information and pleasure in reading your witty writings.
So don't feel guilty; just go on being you as best you can!
Posted by Laura | July 12, 2006 8:21 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 08:21
Oh - and for the record - I think it's awful that they wanted you to pay money to have your children baptized...I had two boys baptized Catholic - I was never asked for a dime. I think you might have had a bad experience with a bad church.
It took me a long time to feel comfortable in my own "Christian skin" for a variety of reasons, and I am now glad to say that I've found a home in a really great Lutheran church (I converted because of my husband). We established roots in 4 churches before we found one we actually liked. It's not automatic.
And Ann Coulter calls the liberal media Godless - just LOOK at this discussion lighting up Steve's blog. Great discussion everyone! No go forth and love someone today!
Posted by Rebecca (token IT Goddess) | July 12, 2006 8:34 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 08:34
I' ve been trying to go forth and love Cindy since 6:14 a.m. this morning . . . but she's having none of it.
What the hell good is it to work from home with your wife if you're not having sex constantly?
This IS, by far, my favorite discussion thread ever on this blog. Not only has it been intersting . . . but it's really helped me get through the last couple of days.
So thanks, everyone.
Steve C.
Posted by Steve C. | July 12, 2006 8:58 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 08:58
Following up with Patrick:
No Catholic prejudice here – although I guess prejudicial people never see themselves that way, eh? I understand the point you make with the Bill of Rights question. Touche.
But following through with that example, in an earlier note you argued that the Catholic church is not just the Vatican and the hierarchy et al, just as “America” isn’t just the government (but rather the people). But the government *is* America to the people on the outside looking in. The policies and practices and “strategery” coming from Washington is what, at the end of the day, affects people. Just as we view (or are encouraged to view) Korea as Kim Jong Il, Iraq as Saddam Hussein. Simple examples, yes, and nothing close to reality, but there you go.
I won’t speak on behalf of other Catholics – just myself. The thoughts and opinions I’ve expressed here are mine alone, and come from my own 12 years of Catholic education, and more years than that of dutiful service. And in my own experience, obeying rules is a cornerstone to the whole shootin’ match. And this goes beyond Catholicism of course. One reason organized religions exist is to keep people in line. Otherwise, it seems to me, they would not need to be “organized.”
Failure to follow the rules used to mean excommunication, or a withholding of the sacraments as a measure of control. In our now slightly more enlightened times, we have a kind of peer pressure compliance – or the oft referred to mix of threats and guilt. That this does not apply to you and all the Catholics you personally know does not make it a reality for the billion other Catholics out there.
I am legitimately happy that *your* experience with the church has differed from the norm. It is surely to your benefit. But my suspicion is that most folks are not as sophisticated in their thought processes and considerations.
Very enjoyable discussion!
Posted by Neruda | July 12, 2006 9:14 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 09:14
I on the other hand think this discussion has caused my valve to close quite violently. Your cousin's death is a reminder that life is too short and that we should enjoy and savor every minute that we can with the people we love. So Cindy as disgusting as it may seem you may want to give in to Steve's grotesque demands.
Don't forget Steve, Fortuna is a capricious sprite and though the cycle may be spinning downward now it should find it's way upward soon.
If your cousin was anything like you I'm sure he filled 80 years of good living in 37 years. My condolences to you, and your cousin's wife and children. They are the ones who are probably suffering the most.
Posted by Fat Bastard | July 12, 2006 9:19 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 09:19
Patrick,
As you know, my father, Larry Ragan, was a devout Catholic. In fact, he devoted much of his free time to editing a Catholic magazine and becoming a fairly well known thinker in the Chicago Catholic community.
So, as you can imagine, Catholicism runs deep in me. I have become used to the usual run-of-the-mill criticism reflected in the above postings. And, as you point out, most of that criticism comes from Cathlolics who no longer have any real connection to the church.
For example, I would have to go back 40 years to remember the last time any priest or nun even mentioned Hell or guilt or Jesus suffering for one's sins. When I walk into Old St. Pat's on a Sunday morning, I see a Catholic community filled with joy, a sunny optimism about life and love and doing good in the community. Absent from that community is all of the stuff Steve alludes to in his posting.
On the other hand, critics of the Catholic Church have every right to attack Rome for its policies on birth control, the way its handled the sexual malfeasance of its priests and the prohibition on marriage for priests. And maybe they have the right to attack Catholics for trying to have it both ways--to worship in a church that advocates the above. Putting it another way, how do we Catholics reconcile our love for the church and all of the loving, amazing experieces we have had there and the bad decisions by our various Popes?
One very inept way of putting it is this: For Catholics, all religion is local.
Take the case of my childhood church in Hazel Crest, Illinois. For most of my life, this church was dominated by white-collar families, all white, all conservative and generally intolerent of people different than themselves. When blacks began moving into our town (and thus our church) in the 1980's, the scene was set for a battle between the older residents, the parents of my friends, and the unwelcome newcomers.
Into this scene walks Fr. Len Dubi, a Chicago priest who had already built a reputation for his radical politics and his unstinting work on behalf of the poor. Over the next 20 years, this one Catholic priest was responsible for bringing the white and blacks of Hazel Crest together and creating a community of faith dedicated to social issues. When he finally left the church two years, ago the pews were packed with tearful blacks, whites, Hispanics who had seen their lives transformed by this one man.
During those 20 years, no one harangued the parishoners about birth control or abortion. No one talked about burning in hell or the evil nature of man. Len Dubi had one message: we're all God's creatures and therefore we have a commitment to love and help one another.
Fr. Dubi would have had a good laugh about Steve's belief that Catholic initatives are only concerned with generating cash. His was one of the poorest parishes on the South Side. There was very little money to be found anywhere, but that poverty of means never got in the way of his incredible accomplishments.
I could go on with dozens of examples of Catholic love and charity, of the church's openess and commitment to its community, of its good fellowship, of the amazing intellects of the brothers who taught me at Quigley South and their goodness and dedication to steering me on the right path. But I have given up trying to argue with Catholic critics because they refuse to see the shades of gray. To them, it always come backs to the Crusades, birth control, abuse by priests, abortion and the way they were treated by nuns in the 50's and early 60's.
The church is a human institution, which means it is both good and bad--just like all of us. Sometimes we act the part of the hero and sometimes we play the villain.
But, sadly, most of our critics, for reasons that are basically self-justifying, refuse to venture into that gray area because they would lost something very precious--the certainty of their own bias.
So, in many ironic ways, the critics become the very image of the Catholic intolerance they deplore.
Mark Ragan
Posted by Mark Ragan | July 12, 2006 9:24 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 09:24
To conclude my comments on this topic and return to the reference to Fortune's Wheel that launced it, one example of Fortune's Wheel spinning up for me was 25 years ago this week, coincidentally, when I met Larry Ragan for my job interview. He said: "Tell me about yourself." I said, "Well, I'm a liberal Democrat, a practicing Catholic, and a former English professor. My hobby is reading." He said, "Me, too. Take a desk." That was a good day.
Patrick
Posted by patrick williams | July 12, 2006 9:34 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 09:34
Mark:
First you write:
>>>>Critics of the Catholic Church have every right to attack Rome for its policies on birth control, the way its handled the sexual malfeasance of its priests and the prohibition on marriage for priests. And maybe they have the right to attack Catholics for trying to have it both ways--to worship in a church that advocates the above.>>>But, sadly, most of our critics, for reasons that are basically self-justifying, refuse to venture into that gray area because they would lost something very precious--the certainty of their own bias.<<<<
Well now, sir . . . which is it? As someone who was born and raised Catholic and who has always followed the dealings of the Catholic church closely, do I have the right to criticize it, as you first said?
Or, is my criticism self-justified whining?
You see, we do NOT disagree. You choose to focus on the good, because organized religion is important to you. I don't begrudge you that.
But anyone who writes off criticism of the Catholic Church----especially after the priest-abuse scandal, and especially in this day and age where they discriminate against gays, divorcees, women, and anyone who chooses to not bring children into a madly overpopulated world---as self-serving whining has his head firmly in the sand, I would say.
Please don't fire me. I need the dough.
Steve C.
Posted by Steve C. | July 12, 2006 10:08 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 10:08
Patrick:
That is a great Larry story. Remind me to one day tell you about one of my first dealings with Larry . . . it involved some unsolicited tugging in the bathroom.
Steve C.
Posted by Steve C. | July 12, 2006 10:20 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 10:20
“Now pray and sing in the company of the church on Sunday and tell me it doesn't change the experience for you.”
__________________________________________
I did for twenty years and I said how it makes me feel ill and faint.
Posted by AN | July 12, 2006 10:34 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 10:34
Steve,
If you read my posting carefully, with an open mind, you'd see that I said the following:
That critics of the Catholic Church usually resort to one of the following:
They attack the church for its policies on abortion, birth control and the celibacy of priests, fulling recognizing (because they have been told repeatedly by people like me) that these issues policies are opposed by the great majority of American Catholics;
Or they fall back on personal anecdotes from the 50's and 60's of a bygone church that focused on Christ's suffering, the tortures of hell, etc.,
Gone from their argument is the other side of the story--that Catholics in America live a religion that is predominently local and that very rarely resembles the church you describe.
Generally speaking, it is a tolerent. loving, charitable, nondiscriminating place where people come together to worship and do good works. The church is made up of thousands of parishes, each with vastly different personalities. It's impossible to generalize about such an institution. But you do so with abandon.
So yes, you can criticize. You can criticize as much as you want. But it would lend credence to your argument if you stopped turning everything into one-dimensional sterotypes.
Your statement about how all things Catholic are concerend with money is ludicrous. As Patrick points out, Catholic Charities and other Catholic institutions are mini-Peace Corps, financing anti-poverty programs around the globe.
It's not your criticism of the Church that bothers me, it's the simple-mindedness of your generalizations, the lack of recognition that there is another story.
When you leave these realities out, you seem to suggest that American Catholics are all dolts, led blindly by money-grubbing priests whose only passion in life is to "diddle" your children.
Do you really believe this? Why is it that so-called liberal minded intellectuals feel free to say outrageoous things about Catholics while representing themselves as tolerent, open-minded people?
Posted by Mark Ragan | July 12, 2006 10:39 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 10:39
Steve,
There you go again. You are simply incapable of making a statement that isn't a gross exaggeration.
In my church, Old St. Pat's, there is a church-sponsored support group of gays and divorcees.
Fr. Dubi was a Catholic priest who faught his entire life against racial and sexual discrimination, as have thousands of priests throughout the country.
And for every child-abusing priest there are 10, 20 or more priests who have spent a lifetime devoted to helping the poor. Hell, some of them are teaching your child for heavan's sake.
And while I'm on the subject of Catholic education, what about all of the nationally recognized Catholic schools that devote half their budgets to free tuition for the poor and have no Catholic requirement at all? How does that square with your smug generalizations?
Steve, are you physically incapable of recognizing gray? Must everything be either/ or? Do you really believe in the distortions you paint?
Posted by Mark Ragan | July 12, 2006 10:51 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 10:51
AN: Well - I always said attending Catholic mass was kind of like an aerobic workout: stand-up, sit down, kneel, stand-up, sit down, walk up to the altar, walk back, kneel, stand up...
I'm sorry your shared experience wasn't the same as mine. As a child I found church exhausting because, well, I was a child.
But as an adult, I find it liberating. I walk out of there feeling a sense of renewal. If you felt so ill and faint...why did you never find another place to worship? To walk away from organized religion because of your experience in one location is like saying "I don't like hamburgers because I didn't like them from Burger King" - like I said, my family and I have been church hoppers for the last 6 years until I finally found a pastor that made sense to me and a Sunday School program that made sense for my kids.
Posted by Rebecca (token IT Goddess) | July 12, 2006 10:51 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 10:51
Mark:
If you would read MY various comments carefuly, you would see that I agree with you, regarding local Catholicism. I said that many parishes do wonderful things for their community. I understand that. I talked about how powerful and effective the Catholic school system is. I know, because I benefited from it, at a time when you couldn't send your kids to Chicago public schools. THere are THOUSANDS of terrific Catholic priests out there who have managed to help MILLIONS of people. I know that, and I've said it.
But to separate the local Catholicism as it's practiced in the streets from the heinous behavior and policies of the overall "Catholic Church" is a tad ridiculous, isn't it?
Especially since those policies coming out of Rome DO affect the grassroots Catholicism---because they result in a lack of priests, a need to funnel funds into the Vatican, and other things.
Let's say you are a liberal Democrat. But you live in a city with a Republican mayor. But he's a good Republican. And he is doing great things for the city. And you like him.
Does that mean you can't criticize George Bush?
Steve C.
Posted by Steve C. | July 12, 2006 10:53 AM
Posted on July 12, 2006 10:53
Mark:
I posted before I read your second comment. That's terrific that some churches have support groups for divorcees and gay people. TERRIFIC!! It also goes against Catholic Doctrine.
What you're saying, and what I agree with, is that the local grassroots Catholic organizations do great things IN SPITE of the official Catholic CHurch, not becaus