Google can now also follow URLs embedded within Flash files, and any text contained in a Flash file. Web developers rejoice!

“If this works out it will be a huge benefit for Flash content and remove some more barriers to entry for certain companies to adopt it,” says Peter Elst, a Flash platform consultant and instructor. “But… I’m pretty skeptical about this approach (Google’s indexing) to be honest and it doesn’t sound like it’s the best way to handle things.”

Perhaps it’s premature to break out the piñata and the Perignon…

Notwithstanding the notion that most don’t want to be cool, most organizations want to serve very specific needs of their target audience. In other words, cool is not a means to an end, but often a dead-end. More importantly, tucked away in a corner of the high-fiving Flash developer party, is the ugly truth that many won’t openly blog about: there are several types of Flash that Google and Yahoo will still not be able to index:

- Flash images without accompanying text
- Video FLV files (the type found on YouTube)
- Most types of JavaScript that launch a Flash file
- Separate HTML, XML or other SWF files launched by Flash will be indexed separately
- Flash content written in bidirectional languages such as Hebrew or Arabic languages

Though it is also working with Adobe, the proprietary owner of Flash, Yahoo’s Flash indexing capabilities are not as advanced as Google. MSN, and the MS search engine at Live.com, are conspicuously absent in announcing their ability to index Flash. Of course, most of the rest of the search engines are still sucking dust.

Still others are a little more frank about the news: “Flash is still evil; please don't use it to design your entire Web site,” says Lisa Barone, a self-proclaimed SEO nerd who has pleaded with clients and readers to not use Flash as a primary development tool (see Don’t Build Your Web Site in Flash).

In other words, Flash is good in small doses, for particular functions (e.g. video presentation, a nice-to-have quick poll, and other non-critical content. “As pretty as it may be in small doses, a Web site entirely in Flash still presents a poor user experience,” adds Barone. “No one wants to sit through that – I don't care how indexable it is.”

There you have it: Flash is still something that’s cool and fun, but is not a practical business alternative to good-old fashioned HTML. There’s still a roll for flash, but no organization should be changing their web development plans to incorporate more flash (that includes all those horrendous web agencies that principally rely on Flash to power most of their sites DESPITE knowing the glaring disadvantages to doing so).

“HTML and Flash may be becoming more equal to the search engines, but most users will still favor an HTML Web site that they can navigate easily,” adds Barone.

The cool folk can continue to flog more Flash, but the business savvy will avoid it at the expense of nerdy pragmatism.

--

DIsclosure: On our corporate website at Prescient Digital Media, we have only 3 flashes files: two are strictly text files that repeat text that is emphasized on the home page, and under our Clients section; a third plays a nice-to-know, non-mission critical video about the company. All of which, I believe, are good examples of when and how to use Flash for a business site.