<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Content Matters</title>
      <link>http://blog.ragan.com/contentmatters/</link>
      <description>A blog for people that make the Web worth reading</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:19:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Microsoft wants Facebook</title>
         <description><![CDATA[After failing in their US$47.5-billion bid for Yahoo, the giant Microsoft is looking more closely at Facebook. While the Wall Street Journal reported that Microsoft bankers have begun to look into a Facebook purchase, neither side has commented on the story (a sure sign that something is afoot).

Facebook in itself is a giant… one that could make Yahoo blush one day. With more than 70 million active users its value was pegged at US$15-billion last October when Microsoft bought a minority stake for a mere US$240-million. 

What makes Facebook an even greater value than its investment price a mere 8 months ago is its growing popularity – and growing platform. There are only 7 websites on the planet that receive more monthly traffic than Facebook – and Facebook only opened to the public 18 months ago after starting as a college only niche. Of the sites that get more traffic (Yahoo is 1st, Google 2nd, YouTube is 3rd), Microsoft’s flagship portal sits in fifth (according to the industry benchmark, Alexa.com). Its viral power is far stronger than MySpace (notwithstanding the music scene), and its growing at a faster clip. I don’t know of anyone that uses MySpace, and yet virtually everyone I know under the age of 45 has a Facebook account. According to ZincResearch.com, 90% of Canadians between the ages of 18 and 34 are Facebook members (9 million).

Of perhaps greater interest is the ever-expanding “Facebook Platform” and its potential as a platform service inside the corporation (for example, intranet platform). Facebook Platform is the place where all of those creative nerds build and add those cute little applications that are optional add ons to your Facebook profile. Popular applications include “Fun Wall” (2.5 million active users), “Scrabulous” and that dam vampire biting ‘game’. 

All of these are nice, viral tools with little or no business value (more than 23,000 have been created in one short year of existence), but the platform has the opportunity to be expanded to host “intranet” type functionality and collaboration tools. Create an invite-only Facebook site, sprinkle in some applications and voila – you have the semblance of a corporate intranet. Of course, I said “semblance.”

According to Facebook, some 1000 business applications have been created. One application, Feedheads, allows the users to “share the feed items you like with your different friends and networks while also displaying your shared items on your profile.” It also works with Google Reader and NewsGator. So, in other words, think of the collaborative calendar offered by Lotus Notes (or Outlook) where the user can see the schedules of others. Feedheads allows you to see a lot more than their schedule depending on what that user or colleague wants to share (e.g. interesting articles, reports on the competition, meeting reminders, etc.).

Notwithstanding the security challenges of a hosted platform, and those security holes that Facebook has worked feverishly to close (or prevent), the Platform is not a real substitute for the intranet which must feature among other things, federated search, application integration, robust security, etc. (At Prescient Digital Media we’re using it as a networking tool -- feel free to join us on the Facebook community <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2723005032">Intranet Global Forum</a>). 

“The problem for any business considering Facebook is that it’s a determinedly consumer play, to the extent that I don’t think it can ever seriously fly in the enterprise,” says analyst and ZDnet writer Phil Wainewright. “Facebook trades free functionality in return for attention and relationship data — and users give up a lot of their control over that data. Businesses aren’t willing to make that trade-off. 

Google is far ahead of Facebook in this respect with the Google App Engine (Google Gadgets), and already has made impressive inroads in the enterprise software business with the Google Mini and Google Enterprise Search. And now you can see why Microsoft is particularly interested in Facebook (more than just acquiring those eyeballs).

The Facebook Platform is not a legitimate enterprise or intranet platform… yet. But it’s only a year old and continuing to evolve; don’t think for a second that Facebook’s management isn’t looking at your business and the revenue potential of becoming the host of collaborative employee applications – or the entire intranet. Microsoft knows it too, and wants a bigger slice of that multi-billion dollar pie.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.ragan.com/contentmatters/2008/05/microsoft_wants_facebook.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.ragan.com/contentmatters/2008/05/microsoft_wants_facebook.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Toby</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:19:18 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Print content resembling lazy web content</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Have you noticed a lack of formal grammar or punctuation in your kids’ homework? How about in correspondence with friends?

Informal communications and writing styles adopted in text messages, email, and new social media tools like blogs have begun to creep into the world of print.

A <a href="http://pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Writing_Report_FINAL3.pdf">new study by Pew Internet</a> reveals that nearly two-thirds of surveyed students (700) say their Web communications style sometimes bleeds into school assignments. 

Roughly 50% admit to omitting proper punctuation and capitalization, and, shockingly, a quarter of them admit to using emoticons such as smiley faces.

“The state of writing among teens today is marked by an interesting paradox: While teens are heavily embedded in a tech-rich world and craft a significant amount of electronic text, they see a fundamental distinction between their electronic social communications and the more formal writing they do for school or for personal reasons,” says the reports authors.

I’ve been saying for about 8 years that the Internet would spawn a writing revolution. I must admit however that I didn’t forsee a possible re-writing of our English language :) LOL! IMO!]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.ragan.com/contentmatters/2008/04/print_content_resembling_lazy.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.ragan.com/contentmatters/2008/04/print_content_resembling_lazy.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Toby</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">e-communications</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">electronic communications</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">emoticons</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">informal</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">print</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">students</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">text</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">texting</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Toby Ward</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">web</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">web vs. print</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Writing</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:10:24 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>One Laptop Per Child abuses donors</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I have a profound respect for charities with great vision and execution. However, I possess a monstrous disdain for those that manipulate the disadvantaged, use them as a platform to further their own personal goals, and take for granted, or even abuse their patrons.

When I heard about <a href="http://www.laptop.org">One Laptop Per Child (OLPC), </a>I immediately stepped-up and supported it. I immediately wrote about and promoted the campaign to encourage the world to buy one of their computers, so that a like computer could be donated to a child or classroom in a third world country.

In fact, the Internet and its denizen of bloggers have helped turn this charity into a massive darling that has received heaps of wonderful, international praise. I encouraged friends, colleagues and readers to support it, and instructed my company, Prescient Digital Media, to spend thousands of dollars on the program. 

In fact, we were a relatively early contributor during the Christmas campaign of 2007. At the time, OLPC promised the delivery of their computers before Christmas. Four months later, and five months after they took our money, no computers have been delivered.]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.ragan.com/contentmatters/2008/04/one_laptop_per_child_abuses_do.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.ragan.com/contentmatters/2008/04/one_laptop_per_child_abuses_do.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Toby</category>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">children</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">laptops</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Mary Lou Jepson</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Nicholas Negroponte</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">OLPC</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">One Laptop per Child</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">poor</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">third world</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">third-world</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Toby Ward</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:11:07 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
