That crunching sound you're hearing in the distance is the sound of the information gravy train grinding to halt, or at least slowing down.
In a move that sent the blogosphere into shrieks of anger yesterday, the venerable Associated Press announced its intention to challenge the posting of its copyrighted material on blogs and Web sites.
While the A.P. backed off its strong words after a firestorm erupted in the blogosphere, it stuck by its pledge to challenge what it believes is the unfair use of its content on the Internet.
In a story reported by The New York Times, the wire service announced that it will "for the first time, attempt to define clear standards as to how much of its articles and broadcasts bloggers and Web sites and excerpt without infringing on the A.P.'s copyright."
This has enormous implications for Web publishing industry. For years, bloggers and small Web publishers have freely used copyrighted material from the A.P., The New York Times, and every other news organization without fear of legal action.
It is not much of a stretch to say that thousands of bloggers---including PR Junkie--feast off the Internet's seemingly endless supply of news.
The firestorm began last week when the wire service fired off a letter to the Drudge Retort, a left-leaning parody of the more famous Drudge Report, demanding that it take down seven posts carrying quotations from its work. The excerpts ranged from 39 to 79 words.
After bloggers screamed in protest, posting dozens of commentaries attacking A.P., the wire service backed off, saying it would regroup to fight the battle another day with a more well defined policy.
“Cutting and pasting a lot of content into a blog is not what we want to see,” Jim Kennedy, vice president and strategy director of The A.P. explained in an interview. “It is more consistent with the spirit of the Internet to link to content so people can read the whole thing in context.”
You can bet that the A.P. is silently being cheered on by the 1,500 newspapers that make up the news cooperative. Indeed, one wonders why it took the wire service so long to challenge the free use of its content.
Free information has been the oxygen supply allowing low-cost web sites to exist. Without it, bloggers would have far less material to publish and comment upon.
Some news sites in the PR industry rely almost entirely on mainstream news organizations for their own news bulletins. Bulldog Reporter and its Daily Dog is a case in point. Every morning, The Daily Dog is sent to thousands of readers hungry for news on the PR and media relations industry. But much of the content in the Daily Dog actually comes from a technique known as "covering the coverage." Writers simply paraphrase or summarize mainstream press reports, being careful to attribute their information to the AP or The Wall Street Journal. The AP wants to challenge that practice for obvious reasons: These organizations are making money off their content.
Web site publishers argue that their use of mainstream news sources falls into the doctrine of "fair use," an age-old legal principle that allows publishers to excerpt small passages of copyrighted material to make an argument. The classic example of fair use cited by most lawyers is the book reviewer who quotes from a novel he or she is reviewing to give readers a sense of the work.
Whether the fair use doctrine will shield bloggers and small web publishers from challenges by the A.P. will be decided if and when a case goes to court.
In the meantime, bloggers are right to worry about their information gravy train toppling over.






sac longchamps Bon endroit pour obtenir avez-longchamp le pliage hobo, sac à mains longchamps, longchamp classic large, ...
Comments (7)
sac longchamps Bon endroit pour obtenir avez-longchamp le pliage hobo, sac à mains longchamps, longchamp classic large, 2011 Sac Longchamp New Best Vente. sac longchamp pas chère, collection Sac LongChamp, LongChamp Pliage Sac à main LongChamps, longchamp en solde portefeuille.
Posted by sac longchamps | July 11, 2012 9:11 PM
Posted on July 11, 2012 21:11
I like your post! It is so unique and creative! Keep update!
Posted by fake oakleys | July 10, 2012 9:31 PM
Posted on July 10, 2012 21:31
Wholesale Hats online store, Shop for high quality designer hats, Wholesale cheap hats direct from china factory,quality Manufacturers, We Are Professional New Era Hats, Adjustable Baseball caps, Fitted, NFL, MLB, 59fifty, Red bull, Jordan hats & caps suppliers.http://www.wholesalehatscheap.com/polo-hats-c-3.html
Posted by Cheap polo hats | January 5, 2012 6:34 PM
Posted on January 5, 2012 18:34
Ahhhh those media plantations. At it still! Seems they'd know by now they can't mandate to the blogosphere. Here's what they get for merely placing another log atop the fort while "the enemy" circles overhead:
http://fourwordexcerpts.tumblr.com/
Posted by SpaceyG | June 21, 2008 8:08 AM
Posted on June 21, 2008 08:08
Journalists do the research and legwork to compile the facts, figures, quotes & present them in story format. It's not the information that is copyrighted, it's the presentation. AP owns the presentation of its material and deserves the same copyright protection as songwriters, authors, recording artists, production companies, etc. If bloggers "cut and paste" (as opposed to quoting & citing their sources), they are incorporating the "presentation" into their own work without compensating the original source.
Posted by Vanette Sherrill | June 20, 2008 4:51 PM
Posted on June 20, 2008 16:51
The AP might have a point if it were not a news organization. Its journalists regularly attribute facts, quotes and information to other sources, many of which are copyrighted. If the AP were to get its way here, then its own information gravy train may be threatened. i.e. leaks, quotes from confidential reports and documents, etc.
Investigative reporting and journalistic freedoms could suffer not from an oppressive government, but from territorial copyright holderes.
Posted by Tim O'Brien | June 17, 2008 2:03 PM
Posted on June 17, 2008 14:03
I just do not see the difference between quoting a source, whether it be on the web or a college paper, so long as the source is correctly cited.
Posted by Lisa Molson | June 17, 2008 9:34 AM
Posted on June 17, 2008 09:34