Editors at The Chicago Tribune are facing the same problem corporate editors began tackling years ago: how to integrate print with online.
Seems Tribune editors are struggling with integration—perhaps downright ignoring it— as they plan a reportedly drastic redesign of the paper. Someone at the Tribune told a Chicago columnist that no one overseeing the redesign has even mentioned print and Web integration.
Corporate editors are deeply concerned with integration, so much so they have an acronym for it, IPO. In fact, creating a quality print publication that works seamlessly alongside a strong intranet is the goal of most, if not all editors. And many of you are reaching that goal.
Maybe you should work for Sam Zell, the billionaire real estate mogul and owner of the Tribune Company.

Zell is laying waste to Tribune-owned newsrooms and slashing the amount of actual news in his papers. To accommodate the diminished news, he ordered redesigns at his papers.
The bright side is he’s letting newsroom staff from each paper handle the redesigns. No meddling from the front office.
At the Chicago Tribune a team of about 30 editors and reporters are mapping out the redesign with an eye on Great Britain’s The Guardian, explained Michael Miner, a columnist for the weekly Chicago Reader. His column focuses primarily on the Chicago media world.
Miner’s information comes from an anonymous source at the Tribune. This paragraph appears near the end of Miner’s July 10 column on the Tribune redesign:
“‘The most troubling thing about this process,’ my contact added, is why no one’s ‘talked about how this new print product will integrate with the Web. These committees are focused solely on the paper, which I think is a futile exercise, because in order to survive we have to figure out how the two complement each other.’”
Scary, isn’t it? In 2008, editors and reporters at one of America’s largest newspapers are not focused on how to integrate their print newspaper with their Web site.
If Miner’s information is correct then I’d advise selling your Tribune shares, but don’t worry, Zell took the company private. He’s the one who should be worried.
Maybe corporate editors should lend a hand—for a reasonable fee, of course.






sac longchamps Bon endroit pour obtenir avez-longchamp le pliage hobo, sac à mains longchamps, longchamp classic large, ...
Comments (4)
Anon,I'm afraid to ask, but what bias are you referring to?
Posted by Michael Sebastian | July 28, 2008 11:20 AM
Posted on July 28, 2008 11:20
Although I still get the L.A. Times home-delivered, I gave up reading its news and opinion sections years ago because of their bias reporting. I get my news mostly from the Web nowadays.
Posted by Anon | July 25, 2008 5:21 PM
Posted on July 25, 2008 17:21
Re: Mr. Zell's Need for Integration
If Mr. Zell wants the next generation of strategic, integrated journalists (print, web, broadcast) he will find them at the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University. He will also find the next generation of marketers and public relations professionals who will help him with his (and his employee's) products in the Department of Integrated Marketing Communications in Medill. In fact, other publishers could have found integrated talent in IMC for the past 16 years as hundreds of now integrated corporations have done.
Posted by Clarke Caywood | July 24, 2008 2:54 PM
Posted on July 24, 2008 14:54
Zell has mindlessly laid waste to the print version of the LA Times, killing the Book Review section and the (fairly new) Thursday weekend Guide section. Newsroom blood-letting continues apace, and whatever smiley face Tribune wants to paint on the "migration" of content to the Web, the savaging of a once-decent print daily now seems irreversible. And none of it seems strategic -- only the pathetic flailing around of a guy who couldn't really afford to buy Tribune in the first place, and who has consistently misrepresented his "commitment" to journalism.
Posted by Ken Greenberg | July 24, 2008 12:21 PM
Posted on July 24, 2008 12:21