Anyone see Monday's Wall Street Journal? Looks like someone at Coca-Cola scored a huge PR victory.
In a page one story about the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac takeovers, two Coke products get ringing endorsements from the story’s authors.
“The decision [to takeover Fannie and Freddie] was hashed out over weeks of meetings. They included … a marathon session over Labor Day weekend, fueled in part by Diet Coke and Coke Zero,” WSJ reported.
Did I mention this story was above the fold?
So even the most casual reader, interested in what America’s financial paper of record says about this historic takeover, will peruse the article and read that Coke products fueled important meetings that might save the mortgage industry.
I’m left to believe there wasn’t Pepsi or Dr. Pepper at these meetings; no tea touched the lips of these bankers; there wasn’t even coffee.
The article could have easily said “a marathon session … fueled by caffeine.” Nope. Coke gets the mention. Someone give that PR person a raise and then mobilize the ad firm.
Imagine the follow up TV ad: A group of bankers sitting around a conference table, tired, a little strung out, ties loosened, sweating. The colors are all muted gray tones.
Outside the building a Coke truck arrives. A driver leaps from the truck’s cab, lands firmly and wipes sweat from his brow. The camera follows him as he wheels cases of ice cold Diet Coke and Coke Zero to the conference room.
The driver busts into the conference room; the bankers perk up. By some moviemaking magic the bottles—glass bottles, that’s important—appear on the conference table and suddenly the colors brighten. The bankers are refreshed and ready to plow through.
Then, from a seat at the corner of the conference table, US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson turns to the camera holding a Diet Coke near his face.
“When I’m reorganizing America’s entire mortgage industry I drink Diet Coke,” he says before taking a refreshing gulp and sighing with satisfaction. “And so should you.”
It doesn't, Colin. Here are four reasons why:
1. This story has yet to gain traction. People are talking about it, and...
Comments (4)
Chris, I think it's more than just that the product is good and people like it. Coffee is terrific and I'm sure they were drinking it at this meeting, but it drew no mention.
Posted by Michael Sebastian | September 10, 2008 1:28 PM
Posted on September 10, 2008 13:28
I don't think a PR person actually pitched the authors of this Wall Street Journal story suggesting they include a Coke mention in the story.
Sarah, I think you're right, it's all about the brand. And someone could write that off as simply a result of Coke's long history, or charming polar bear commercials. But it's much more than that; it's the brand and what communicators have done to nurse it.
So no, one PR person does not need a raise; an entire team of people do.
That said, I must add that I prefer Pepsi. It is the choice of a new generation, after all.
Posted by Michael Sebastian | September 10, 2008 1:23 PM
Posted on September 10, 2008 13:23
I like Ragan's take on PR, but this time I think you're wide of the mark. The product is good. People like it. That's why it gets a mention - because people drink it - not because of any work that any PR person has done. Surely?
Posted by Chris Reed | September 10, 2008 1:08 PM
Posted on September 10, 2008 13:08
Yes, it is a great win for Coke, but it seems extremely unlikely that a PR person was responsible for planting that reference. It seems a lot more likely that the session was Diet Coke fueled and the reporter just made a note of that detail. DC has built amazing brand recognition which is probably what prompted this name check.
Posted by Sara | September 10, 2008 11:18 AM
Posted on September 10, 2008 11:18