Setting aside the policy and stump speeches of last night’s vice presidential debates, each candidate had one humanizing moment when cynics on either side of the aisle let their guard down if only briefly.
For Palin, that moment came about two-thirds into the evening as she spoke about education and gave “a shout out” to her brother’s third grade class.
It was as natural as a “shout out” can be, preceded by a wink to her father in the audience—nice touch. Maybe the shout out and wink weren’t presidential, but it was quaint and, well, nice.
Meanwhile, Biden, the alleged “blow hard,” had the evening’s most authentic and touching moment. He choked up and paused when mentioning his dead first wife and daughter, and once critically injured sons.
Call it his Hillary moment—Clinton tearing up in a New Hampshire diner—but that reflective pause humanized Biden. I watched the debate with my mom, an unapologetic Palin fan; she turned to me and said, without a hint of cynicism or irony, “That was very touching.”
If Palin helped shore up elements of small town America with her third grade shout out, Biden pulled Palin swing voters to his side with that very touching and revealing moment.






Hello!
Reassuring to see that BP oil spill is number one. I will take this to mean, being the eternal optimist that I a...
Comments (15)
With all my heart, I wish I could cheer on the female candidate here, but in five short weeks Palin has accomplished what it took George Bush five years to do - develop in me an automatic response to the sound of their voice that is equivalent to how I react to fingernails on chalkboard. It's that patent insincerity!
Posted by Debra | October 5, 2008 10:27 PM
Posted on October 5, 2008 22:27
Biden impressed me. Palen is a goof.
Posted by Chris | October 4, 2008 9:07 PM
Posted on October 4, 2008 21:07
Joe Biden is a careerlong bullshit artist. And he just kept smiling all night because you can't bullshit a bullshitter.
I would argue that not only can he cry on cue, he can stutter on cue. Remember the word he tripped over early on? Its humanizing and subtle move that makes you want to pull for him.
Palin doesn't have her act down and polished yet. She went to the "darnright" too many times. She lost the natural subtlty of a once-real trait.
Anymore she's playing a characature of herself and all the winks and the nods and the gollygee-youbetchas are starting to become a nervous tick.
She's about to outdo Tina Fey.
Posted by Sue | October 4, 2008 12:57 PM
Posted on October 4, 2008 12:57
Yes, pausing to recall his first wife and his daughter was a humanizing moment for Joe Biden in his debate performance. But it only partly offset his bald lying in recent weeks about the circumstances of that tragic auto accident. The local Delaware news media and at least one national TV news channel reminded Joe that he has fabricated a story about his wife being a victim of a drunken driver; actually, she missed a stop sign and pulled into the path of a truck whose driver was stone sober and mortified by the outcome. Sure, it was a tragic lifelong loss, but also yet another total fabrication in a series of fabrications by a career DC pol. Credibility still counts !
Posted by Phil Wescott | October 3, 2008 3:24 PM
Posted on October 3, 2008 15:24
Who was coaching Palin? I want to hire them! They sure turned her around from the last few weeks... Truly a smiling robot.
Posted by Jacquie | October 3, 2008 1:09 PM
Posted on October 3, 2008 13:09
I would expect that Gov Palin would stopped smiling so broadly and assume a more somber facial expression when Sen Biden discussed his personal loss. Extra credit is she would have said "Joe, I'm sorry for your loss" before she took off with her next set of comments instead of completely ignoring the situation. It was the disconnect of her response during such a moment that caused us a TIVO moment to confirm that we were really seeing what happened.
Posted by Anonymous | October 3, 2008 12:43 PM
Posted on October 3, 2008 12:43
His tears were extrmely authentic, I am sure. However, politicians are not beyond summoning their own emotions, combined with the real-life stories that explain their tears to garner sympathy appeal. As an aside, I've seen coaches do the same thing. Very powerful and very real and I'm afraid, sometimes a very calculating motivational technique. John McCain, while not tearing up, has referenced his painful POW experience to create more than a few touching moments. So has Joe Biden. He did so in Pennsylvania a little over a week ago. If I sound cynical, I just find it baffling that he can take an unimaginable tragedy he experienced and localize it according to the audience (kitchen table issues last night, Pittsburgh Steelers a week ago, and at the Democratic convention he teared up remembering the same tragedy while telling Delaware Dems how important they were to him at that time). Maybe I'm not cut out to be a politician, but if I know something's going to break me up in public, I'm not going to raise the issue repeatedly in public unless I actually want people to see me cry.
See link.
http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/video/17560195/index.html
Posted by Anonymous | October 3, 2008 12:30 PM
Posted on October 3, 2008 12:30
I guess distorting the facts "only" 1/3rd of the time is OK, but 1/2 of the time is too much. ??? Unfortunatly we set the threshold too low. We should expect and demand better.
Posted by Jim | October 3, 2008 12:23 PM
Posted on October 3, 2008 12:23
What in the world is she supposed to do when Biden got all choked up...walk over and hug him? That would have been great, but get real, Biden was as scripted as anyone in the room (including his comment about his dead wife)..he's just better at it because he's been doing it in D.C. for 35 years. I'll take Palin's wink and shout out anyday.
Posted by mstew | October 3, 2008 12:08 PM
Posted on October 3, 2008 12:08
"Unfortunately, half of the "facts' that Biden rattled off were not true."
Actually, if you had fact-checked correctly, you'd know that two-thirds of Biden's facts were accurate, so you have lost all respect I had for you.
Posted by Tony Mastroni | October 3, 2008 12:05 PM
Posted on October 3, 2008 12:05
Palin was so focused on reciting her talking points that she was emotionally detached from Biden's personal pain when he spoke of the death of his loved ones. It was all about her and the political "information dump" she had been programed to spew. This is not a woman who spoke from the heart; this is a woman who talked the talk of her Republican party (after a tremendous amount of coaching).
Posted by Michelle | October 3, 2008 12:01 PM
Posted on October 3, 2008 12:01
Steve
Facts and politicians are such polar opposites that it shouldn't even be a consideration when hearing the latter speak.
Thankfully, I fell asleep during last night's debate. I was getting really ticked that I couldn't tell who was the liberal and who was the conservative.
I'm voting Libertarian. I can't take this anymore.
Posted by Jon | October 3, 2008 11:59 AM
Posted on October 3, 2008 11:59
Unfortunately, half of the "facts' that Biden rattled off were not true.
He lost my respect last night.
Posted by Steve | October 3, 2008 11:50 AM
Posted on October 3, 2008 11:50
Palin's complete inability to react in a human way to Biden's emotional moment says much more about her character than her pre-scripted, gee-golly "shout-out."
Posted by Carolyn | October 3, 2008 10:54 AM
Posted on October 3, 2008 10:54
A wink's as good as a nod to a blind horse.
Posted by Sue | October 3, 2008 10:27 AM
Posted on October 3, 2008 10:27