UPDATES APPENDED
I just talked to a representative for a supermarket chain. They apparently have a policy of not talking to trade publications, but the rep called me anyway just to tell me that and to give me a bit of off-the-record information. Or, maybe they just wanted to make sure I’m not a threat.
I happen to shop at this supermarket chain, and I told the rep that, so I probably passed the “no-threat” test. But, they and all communications professionals should recognize by now that there are threats around every corner when it comes to the Internet and social media–traditional media outlets and journalists are the least of their troubles. Trade publications, too, are published online now–anyone can access them. Same with blogs. And tweets by regular old consumers. This type of old-fashioned thinking gets companies into trouble everyday, and still more continue the trend and they, too, get in trouble. I’m not sure if this particular supermarket chain has a no-blogger policy as well–I asked, but I’m not sure I’m worth the call back. I wouldn’t be surprised, though; bloggers (and trade pubs) are often overlooked at companies with small communications staffs.
Let’s think back to Target’s debacle last year that resulted from a similar policy. They didn’t talk to trade pubs and they also didn’t talk to bloggers, they said, so they could focus on publications that reach their core audience. It’s a valid point–we’re always telling communicators to find their audience and focus on those media and social media outlets. But, the bloggers made a fuss about the policy as bloggers are wont to do, and the story about Target shunning bloggers made it all the way to the New York Times, which does reach its core audience. I’m still waiting on a call back to see if Target has since reversed that policy.
Procter & Gamble, on the other hand, thinks bloggers are so important that they’re sponsoring a “pampering party” before this year’s BlogHer Conference in Chicago.
Moral of the story: It’s 2009. Anyone can get online these days, anyone can get millions of views and lots of attention. Anything popular online can end up in the New York Times or on CNN, thereby tarnishing your brand in the minds of the consumers you’re looking to reach in a positive way. Non-traditional media reach consumers, too. Ignore at your own peril.
UPDATE #1: The supermarket chain rep says bloggers go through customer service. The website says customer service questions are best answered in store and doesn't provide a corporate phone number. Does that mean I can go tonight, pick up a few groceries and get my communications-strategy questions answered while i'm checking out?
UPDATE #2: Target's communications department doesn't discriminate anymore, says Target spokesman Joshua Thomas. Now, whether the pub is trade, a blog, or CNN, communicators evaluate each request as it comes in and respond accordingly.






Thank author sharing, I very much agree with your views...
Comments (5)
CTYLTQBHLWMHRN
Sacs Lancel ont été rigide et manque d'ingéniosité , à cet effet sur ??le marché pour eux a diminué .
Posted by sac Lancel | March 10, 2012 12:29 AM
Posted on March 10, 2012 00:29
Wow. If anyone is NOT using online outlets and social media at this point they are too far behind and are no longer an effective communicator. It is our responsibility to know the trends and know where our audience is - if you are not there, your competitor will be. They'll take the press and send you a mental thank you note.
Posted by Jackie Smith | July 29, 2009 12:00 PM
Posted on July 29, 2009 12:00
In today's rapidly changing and fragmented market, you ignore non-traditional media at your own peril! Citizen journalism is in the process of overtaking 'professional' journalism and there is simply no turning back.
Joe Troxler
Communications & Media Relations Consultant
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posted by Joe Troxler | July 28, 2009 12:28 PM
Posted on July 28, 2009 12:28
My mouth dropped open in disbelief when I read that Target's communications policy unilaterally filtered out bloggers. It's one thing if the limitations were based on resource constraints, but (come on now) Target's proclamation to (instead) focus on its "core audience" is flimsy and offensive.
As a regular Target shopper and someone smack-dab in the middle of its ideal demographic, I'm disappointed in them. This is a good illustration of what control issues will do to a company's decision-making skills.
It sounds as if Target has started to accept that the consumer really does control the conversation these days, and that blogs are the new consumer water cooler.
As for the supermarket, I'll venture a guess that they'll wake up one day and realize that all of its customers now shop at Fresh Market.
Posted by MarketingVeep | July 27, 2009 10:06 AM
Posted on July 27, 2009 10:06
Please learn to spell Procter & Gamble.
Posted by Don Ranly | July 24, 2009 2:47 PM
Posted on July 24, 2009 14:47