On Tuesday afternoon a headline flashed across The Business Insider blog: “IT BEGINS: Gatorade Discontinues Tiger Line.”
Here’s the post from The Business Insider deputy editor Joe Weisenthal:
It is laughable if it were true.
If you actually read the story from CNBC, which this post doesn’t link to, it says: “Critics might say that Gatorade is just reacting to the recent news, but industry trade Beverage Digest actually reported the discontinuation of the Gatorade Tiger Focus line on Nov. 25, two days before the accident occurred.”
The Beverage Digest story is locked down to nonsubscribers, so we’ll just take CNBC’s word for it.
UPDATE: The Chicago Tribune spoke with Beverage Digest editor John Sicher, who confirmed that he heard about Gatorade's decision last month.
As you may have noted by now, Weisenthal failed to include this fact in his post. Seems a bit insidious, doesn't it? Without a link to CNBC, he has to assume most readers won’t check his facts. Then again, maybe he's just lazy, or, to give him the benefit of the doubt, rushed. After all, the CNBC story is a whole seven paragraphs long.
One enterprising reader did read the entire CNBC story and pointed out Weisenthal's oversight in the comments. Here's that reader's comment:

At this point, you'd probably expect Weisenthal to acknowledge the oversight and drop an update in his post. Instead, he offered this remark in the comments:

So let's get this straight. Without an update or retraction, Weisenthal is assuming that Gatorade is full of it. His comment seems to suggest that he's sticking to his guns and that soon enough the truth will be revealed. This means that—since Beverage Digest reported on the move two days before the incident outside Tiger's home—Weisenthal is suggesting that Gatorade not only knew that Tiger was cheating on his wife—which could be true—but also foresaw that he would get in a one-car accident outside his mansion while allegedly fired up on booze and pharmaceutical drugs and that's why Gatorade discontinued it's Tiger focus line.
Right.
Facts are so inconvenient.






You also know how to make people rally behind it, obviously from the responses. Thanks dude...
Comments (6)
Buy Cheap Nike Free HyperTR Men's Training Shoes Black Red lets you meet your workout demands. Heel and forefoot rubber pods give multidirectional traction and control on all surfaces. This shoe's highly-flexible sole enables you to experience some of the benefits of barefoot training while still giving you the cushioning, support and traction you require when you are challenging yourself to excel.
Posted by Nike Free HyperTR Men's Training Shoes Black Red | November 14, 2011 3:31 AM
Posted on November 14, 2011 03:31
And journalists are upset with the blogging community, who frequently write based on speculation and a personal agenda. Now we have real journalists [sic] doing it too?
Posted by Shawn | December 9, 2009 2:36 PM
Posted on December 9, 2009 14:36
If Gatorade will help me see the future, I'm going to chug a case of the stuff tonight.
Posted by Jody D | December 9, 2009 2:15 PM
Posted on December 9, 2009 14:15
The 33-year-old golfer’s ranking on a list of celebrity endorsers plunged to 24th from 6th, based on the Davie Brown Index, which marketers and advertising agencies use to gauge the ability of personalities to influence consumer behavior.
(Bloomberg)--adding this for all the folks who think Tiger's private life shouldn't have anything to do with his professional life. Private screw ups can hurt public earnings. But why does Rosenthal have to sound so gleeful about it?
Posted by Cheryl | December 9, 2009 9:55 AM
Posted on December 9, 2009 09:55
Boo!
Posted by Anonymous | December 9, 2009 8:19 AM
Posted on December 9, 2009 08:19
Weisenthal is just doing what most journalists do nowadays. Start sentences with "critics say" and then spin their own news. Any time you see "critics say," what the writer is really saying is, "I believe..." Insidious? Yes, but I've seen it happen first-hand quite a bit. I've come to expect news stories to reflect that parallel universe that only exists in a reporter's agenda.
Posted by Anonymous | December 8, 2009 10:56 PM
Posted on December 8, 2009 22:56