<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>PR junkie</title>
      <link>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/</link>
      <description>A new blog for communication addicts</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>March 15, 2010 10:54 PM</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Letterman: ‘Top 10 signs you’re spending too much time on Twitter’</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<object width='400' height='300'><param name='movie' value='http://www.cbs.com/e/lpyrrralROzU_Dq70fd6mrS8h8ejy0YK/cbs/1/'></param><param name='allowFullScreen' value='true'></param><param name='allowScriptAccess' value='always'></param><embed width='400' height='300' src='http://www.cbs.com/e/lpyrrralROzU_Dq70fd6mrS8h8ejy0YK/cbs/1/'  allowfullscreen='true' allowScriptAccess='always' type='application/x-shockwave-flash'></embed></object>


Here's a <a href="http://www.cbs.com/late_night/late_show/video/?pid=lpyrrralROzU_Dq70fd6mrS8h8ejy0YK&play=true&vs=Default">link</a> to the video. ]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/03/letterman_top_10_signs_youre_s.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/03/letterman_top_10_signs_youre_s.html</guid>
         <rdailyemail>The late-night funnyman lampooned the popular social network.</rdailyemail>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">David Letterman</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">top 10 signs you&apos;re spending too much time on Twitter</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Twitter</category>
        
         <pubDate>March 15, 2010 10:54 PM</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Top 10 Facebook privacy settings</title>
         <description><![CDATA[This afternoon, Scott Meis, the senior project and social media director at Carolyn Grisko & Associates, a Chicago strategic communications firm, presented a <em><a href="http://prdaily.com">PR Daily</a></em> webinar all about how to use Facebook for PR. 

During the webinar, he offered the top 10 privacy settings for Facebook. 

Here they are: 

1. Use your friend lists. That way, you can group your networks together and create customized lists. 

2. Remove yourself—if you want—from Facebook search results. 

3. Remove yourself—if you want—from Google search. 

4. Avoid the photo/video tag mistake. If you’re out on a weekend night and someone snaps photographs of you (doing something embarrassing, maybe), make sure you remove any tags on the pictures that will then show up on your wall. 

5. Protect your own photo albums, that is, keep them private from certain members of your network if you like. 

6. Customize your newsfeed. This way, you can prevent certain items from posting on your newsfeed.  
 
7. Protect yourself from applications: Be careful which ones you try out on Facebook. The goofy ones may be too racy for certain members of your network. 

8. Common sense: Avoid embarrassing wall posts.

9. Keep friendships private. Are you friends with someone and don’t want other members of your network to know about it? Go ahead and mark a friendship as private. 

10. Make your contact information private. Of course, if you’re using Facebook for business only, then this might be a bad idea. 

You can follow <a href="http://twitter.com/ScottMeis">Scott on Twitter</a> and read his blog, <a href="http://scottmeis.com/">Social Media Snippets</a>.  

If you want to learn more about this webinar—including how to buy a recording of it—shoot me an e-mail. <a href="mailto:michaels@ragan.com">michaels@ragan.com</a>. 
]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/03/top_10_facebook_privacy_settin.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/03/top_10_facebook_privacy_settin.html</guid>
         <rdailyemail>Steps you can take to keep your content safe and sound. </rdailyemail>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Carolyn Grisko &amp; Associates</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Facebook</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Facebook privacy</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">PR Daily</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Scott Meis</category>
        
         <pubDate>March 11, 2010  3:00 PM</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Why does the NY Times think Hillary Clinton is a 3-foot angel?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Check out this screen grab of The New York Times homepage on Tuesday: 


<img alt="NYTimes_blooper.jpg" src="http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/NYTimes_blooper.jpg" width="750" height="358" />


If you can’t see it, here’s a <a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_YAqyEoNiXNU/S45OjSR90XI/AAAAAAAABNY/i-GxEiHqqc0/s1600-h/NYT-Clinton-Photo-Caption.jpg">link to a clearer picture</a>. 

I know Fox News sees Hillary Clinton that way, but The Times? 

(Thanks to <a href="twitter.com/word_czar">word_czar</a> for sharing this pic.) 
]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/03/why_does_the_ny_times_think_hi_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/03/why_does_the_ny_times_think_hi_1.html</guid>
         <rdailyemail>Or maybe that’s a misprint. You be the judge. </rdailyemail>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Hillary Clinton</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">The New York Times</category>
        
         <pubDate>March  5, 2010 10:56 AM</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Hilarious C-Span video from Second City</title>
         <description><![CDATA[From Second City Network:

<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YuhfMWjHCkM&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YuhfMWjHCkM&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>


(h/t <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/if-only-this-was-a-real-c-span-commercial/">Mediaite</a>) ]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/hilarious_cspan_video_from_sec.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/hilarious_cspan_video_from_sec.html</guid>
         <rdailyemail>It’s a minute long and it will make you laugh—OK, chuckle at the very least. </rdailyemail>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">C-Span</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">mediaite</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Second City</category>
        
         <pubDate>February 25, 2010 12:24 PM</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>How much do you know about Generation Y?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[So you were born between 1980 and 1992, technically making you part of Generation Y, the Millennial Generation, Generation Next, the Pepsi Generation, or whatever they’re calling it this week.

But do you feel like you aren’t of your generation? 

Or, perhaps conversely, you were born before 1980, and, given what you’ve read about Gen Y, you feel like, yeah, you might be more Millennial than Baby Boomer. 

The <em>Red Eye</em>, which is the <em>Chicago Tribune</em>’s free commuter daily, a paper geared towards Millennials, created a quiz to determine your knowledge of Generation Y. (It comes on the heels of a <a href="http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1501/%20millennials-new-survey-generational-personality-upbeat-open-new-ideas-technology-bound">Pew study about 20-somethings</a>.) Give it a whirl. Maybe you know more—or less—about Generation Y than you think. 

Here’s <a href="http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/redeye/2010/02/quiz-millennials-exposed.html">the quiz</a>. Good luck. 
]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/how_much_do_you_know_about_gen.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/how_much_do_you_know_about_gen.html</guid>
         <rdailyemail>Forget birth dates; take the quiz to find out. </rdailyemail>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">baby boomers</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">chicago tribune</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">generation next</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">generation y</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">millennials</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">pew</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">red eye</category>
        
         <pubDate>February 25, 2010  8:24 AM</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Dallas Tea Party makes splash with low-budget YouTube video</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Have you heard about the brouhaha between MSNBC host Keith Olbermann and the Dallas Tea Party? Olbermann attacked the group for its lack of diversity. In response, the Dallas Tea Party created an (allegedly) <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMdPTpOyUk4">low-budget video</a>, which it posted to YouTube.
 
(I say allegedly, because these things tend to have backers with deep pockets. Maybe it just appears low budget, so bloggers and news media will refer to it as such.)

The video is effective. It features several men and women of color calling out Olbermann and MSNBC for the network’s own lack of diversity. The group then invites Olbermann — and whoever’s watching — to attend their next event. 

So far the video has more than 100,000 views on YouTube, and it was posted on Monday. 

On his show Tuesday, Olbermann called the Web site, <em>Mediaite</em>, which posted the video (where I first saw it), “<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/keith-olbermann-calls-mediaite-gullible-for-reporting-an-inconvenient-truth/">gullible</a>.” 

Here’s the video — watch for the typo:

<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hMdPTpOyUk4&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hMdPTpOyUk4&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>


Did you see it? At 1 minute 16 seconds there’s a photograph of a tea party protestor carrying a sign that says, “I did’nt serve 22 years for socialism.” 


<img alt="tea_party_video.jpg" src="http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/tea_party_video.jpg" width="500" height="302" />


Ouch. 


]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/dallas_tea_party_makes_splash.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/dallas_tea_party_makes_splash.html</guid>
         <rdailyemail>But wait until you see the spelling error.</rdailyemail>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">dallas tea party</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Keith Olbermann</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">mediaite</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">msnbc</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">tea party</category>
        
         <pubDate>February 23, 2010 10:16 PM</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Hey, Tiger, was that a press conference or a hostage video?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Did you see it? The Tiger press conference? 

Here was the part that made the biggest impression on me.

About 3 minutes and 40 seconds into the press conference, Tiger said, “For all that I have done, I am so sorry.” He then paused deliberately and made eye contact with the camera, presumably to lock eyes with you, the viewer, to really drive home the point. 

It was awkward, and it felt like one of those hostage videos when someone is forced, at gunpoint, to read a statement damning his or her nation and culture. 

As I watched, I wanted to say (with a heavy whisper): “Tiger, if you’re in danger blink twice and we’ll send help. 

“Blink twice.”

<img alt="tiger_press_conference.jpg" src="http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/tiger_press_conference.jpg" width="500" height="277" />


And here's the video in case you missed it:


<object width="416" height="374" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="ep"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=sports/2010/02/19/sot.tiger.woods.statement.cnn" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=sports/2010/02/19/sot.tiger.woods.statement.cnn" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416" wmode="transparent" height="374"></embed></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/hey_tiger_was_that_a_press_con_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/hey_tiger_was_that_a_press_con_1.html</guid>
         <rdailyemail>Blink twice if you’re in danger.</rdailyemail>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Tiger Woods</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Tiger Woods press conference</category>
        
         <pubDate>February 19, 2010 11:12 AM</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Which celebrities are more disliked than Tiger?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[When the world learned last November that Tiger Woods is a philandering sex maniac, the golfer went from being a hero to a zero. And that’s not a subjective observation. 

According to the Davie-Brown Index, which tracks America’s sentiments for celebrities, Tiger Woods <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703444804575071663150820760.html">fell from No. 9 to No. 2,411</a>. There are 2,449 celebrities on the Index. 

That means Americans dislike 38 celebrities more than Tiger. 

On Thursday morning, I called Matt Fleming, a senior account manager at Davie-Brown. <em>The Wall Street Journal</em> cited him when mentioning Tiger’s slide on the Index. I want to ask Mr. Fleming to identify these 38 celebrities. 

(I can’t find the Davie-Brown Index for free online. Maybe it's just me. If you have it and would like to share it, please do.)

I left Mr. Fleming a message, and by end of the day Thursday he had not yet responded.

So, I thought I’d just speculate on which celebrities are more disliked (or, if you prefer, less popular) than Tiger. Here are 38 candidates (in no particular order) that could make the list. Thanks to all the Raganites—and my lovely wife—who chipped in on this one:

1. John Mayer
2. O.J. Simpson
3. Jessica Simpson
4. David Hasselhof
5. Kim Kardashian
6. Ann Coulter
7. Paris Hilton
8. Daryl Hall
9. John Oates
10. Carrot Top
11. Jon 
12. Kate
13. “Speidi” (Spencer Pratt and Heidi Montag)
14. Molly Ringwald
15. Adam Sandler
16. The Octomom
17. Larry the Cable Guy
18. Celine Dion
19. Don Imus
20. Chuck Norris
21. Rush Limbaugh
22. Steve Guttenberg
23. Yevgeny Plushenko
24. Martha Stewart
25. Giuliana Rancic
26. Howard Stern
27. Keith Olbermann
28. Chris Brown
29. Eliot Spitzer
30. Tila Tequila
31. Glenn Beck
32. Billy Bush
33. JWoww
34. The L.A. Lakers
35. Sean Hannity
36. The guy who played Screech Powers
37. Jay Leno
38. Sarah Palin

What do you think? Who would you add to the list?
]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/which_celebrities_are_more_dis.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/which_celebrities_are_more_dis.html</guid>
         <rdailyemail>He’s gone from hero to zero—but 38 celebrities are bigger losers. </rdailyemail>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Davie Brown</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Davie-Brown Index</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Tiger Woods</category>
        
         <pubDate>February 18, 2010  5:27 PM</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>To promote stimulus act, Democrats create lame iPhone spoof</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/01/25/cnn-poll-majority-of-americans-say-much-of-stimulus-wasted/?fbid=n2cHbBFPqbT">recent poll</a> showed that most Americans believe the Obama administration has wasted half the money in the stimulus package. Many observers—perhaps most notably <a href="http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/01/25/too-dumb-to-thrive/"><em>Time</em>'s Joe Klein</a>—claim the White House has poorly communicated the stimulus to the American public. 

Well, today (February 17) is the anniversary of the signing of the Recovery Act, better known as the stimulus, and Democrats <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j_uiAU6uwN5XVEsj-xdaXFFL0ZYAD9DTSSDO0">are out touting its effectiveness</a>. To assist this PR push, Deomcrat-controlled <a href="http://edlabor.house.gov/">Committee on Education and Labor</a> created a 30-second video spoof of the popular iPhone commercials, “There’s an app for that.” This video is called, "There's an Act for that." 

Good idea, bad execution. I hope they didn't spend too much (taxpayer's) money on this video that only tells me someone on the committee really loves his or her iPhone. 

Here’s the video: 

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5EWbzw64n4c&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5EWbzw64n4c&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


(h/t to <em><a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2010/02/democrats_tout_one_year_recove.html">Chicago Sun-Times</em> Washington correspondent Lynn Sweet</a>.)]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/hyping_stimulus_act_democrats.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/hyping_stimulus_act_democrats.html</guid>
         <rdailyemail>Good idea, bad execution. </rdailyemail>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Chicago Sun-Times</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Democrats</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">iPhone</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Lynn Sweet</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Recovery Act</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">There&apos;s an app for that</category>
        
         <pubDate>February 17, 2010 11:22 AM</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Southwest hits PR turbulence after dust up with too fat to fly director</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Tough President’s Day for Southwest Airlines: The Teflon brand, which has successfully thwarted several PR flare ups, is smack in the middle of the debate about airlines’ treatment of overweight passengers. 

As you probably know, a Southwest pilot <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE61F03T20100216">asked the movie director</a>, Kevin Smith, to leave a flight Saturday night, claiming Smith was too large—or as many media outlets have put it, "too fat to fly"—and insisting that he buy a second seat on the airplane. 

Southwest has a well-established policy of asking people deemed too large for their seats to purchase a second seat. 

Smith directed cult classics, like <em>Clerks</em> and <em>Mallrats</em>, and stinkers like his last three movies.* For the last 48 hours he’s directed a social media assault against Southwest, with <a href="http://twitter.com/thatkevinsmith">tweets about the incident</a> flowing minute-by-minute. Here are two back-to-back tweets he sent around 5 p.m. ET Monday. I put them together as one sentence. 

“Everyone’s so scared to admit to fault/f***up, for fear of getting sued. In front of y'all, I say this: I'll never sue @SouthwesternAir, no matter WHAT facts may emerge. I don't want any @SouthwestAir $$$, I want south western justice! You should get that, as you guys are Texans!”

As you can probably tell, <a href="http://twitter.com/SouthwestAir">@SouthwesternAir</a> is Southwest’s Twitter feed. 

In typical fashion, Southwest jumped all over the problem. By Sunday afternoon, the airline had addressed the issue on its blog, <a href="http://www.blogsouthwest.com/blog/not-so-silent-bob">Nuts About Southwest</a>. “First and foremost, to Mr. Smith; we would like to echo our Tweets and again offer our heartfelt apologies to you,” Southwest spokesperson Christi Day blogged. “We are sincerely sorry for your travel experience on Southwest Airlines.”

According to Day, Southwest attempted to call Smith to apologize personally.

Day explained the incident in the blog post; Smith spent Monday insisting that aspects of the blog post are untrue. For instance, the blog post said, “Mr. Smith originally purchased two Southwest seats on a flight from Oakland to Burbank—as he’s been known to do when traveling on Southwest.” 

Outraged, Smith said on his Twitter page that he does not <em>regularly</em> purchase two tickets on Southwest and, if even if it were true, slammed the airline for sharing personal information about a customer. 

This whole Smith incident is a problem for Southwest that could last longer than the usual whiplash-inducing news cycle. Here’s why: 

<strong>1. Smith is a movie director. </strong>You know the saying about never picking a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel. Well, what about a guy who buys celluloid by the metric ton? Southwest could become the butt of jokes in Smith’s future movies. 

<strong>2. Smith is promoting a movie, <em>Cop Out</em>, right now.</strong> That means every reporter he speaks to will ask him about the incident. Judging by Smith’s reaction to the incident, he’ll be all too happy to respond. 

<strong>3. Smith is social media savvy. </strong>The airlines is praised often—by Ragan maybe more than anyone—for its social media chops. And rightly so, the company has tackled many high-profile PR problems with its blog (remember the skirt incident?). However, Smith is an avid Twitter member with more than 1.5 million followers. Southwest has slightly more than 1 million followers.

<strong>4. Smith is representative of two-thirds of America.</strong> According to the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/overwt.htm">Centers for Disease Control</a>, 67 percent of U.S. adults, older than 20, are overweight or obese. (I can’t say how much Smith weighs, but in 2008, Smith <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/herocomplex/2008/10/kevin-smith-say.html">told</a> <em>The Los Angeles Times</em> that he planned to take a break from directing to lose weight before it compromises his health.) 

<strong>5. Smith received a personal apology from Southwest.</strong> This is probably the biggest strike against the airlines. How often does the company personally apologize to all the other people it asks to buy two seats on Southwest flights? 

<img alt="kevin-smith.jpg" src="http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/kevin-smith.jpg" width="360" height="420" />

*<em>Zack and Miri Make a Porno</em> was pretty good. 
]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/southwest_hits_pr_turbulence_a_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.ragan.com/prjunkie/2010/02/southwest_hits_pr_turbulence_a_1.html</guid>
         <rdailyemail>Five reasons why this incident is a problem that could last longer than the usual whiplash-inducing news cycle.</rdailyemail>
        
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Kevin Smith</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Nuts About Southwest</category>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Southwest</category>
        
         <pubDate>February 15, 2010  4:51 PM</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
